Cited by 149Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

"The Right to Explanation, Explained"

Open access
Kaminski, Margot E.·2019·btlj

Abstract

Many have called for algorithmic accountability: laws governing decision-making by complex algorithms, or AI. The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) now establishes exactly this. The recent debate over the right to explanation (a right to information about individual decisions made by algorithms) has obscured the significant algorithmic accountability regime established by the GDPR. The GDPR’s provisions on algorithmic accountability, which include a right to explanation, have the potential to be broader, stronger, and deeper than the preceding requirements of the Data Protection Directive. This Essay clarifies, largely for a U.S. audience, what the GDPR actually requires, incorporating recently released authoritative guidelines.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.15779/z38td9n83h

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaminski, M. E.
Corresponding author
Kaminski, Margot E.
Venue
btlj
Publisher
btlj
Published
2019
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
189
OpenAlex
W3123831349
Cited by
146
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 11
FWCI
174.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Colorado Law Scholarly Commons (University of Colorado Colorado Springs) (submittedVersion)
  • Berkeley technology law journal
  • UC Berkeley
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
right to explanation, algorithmic accountability, General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR, EU Data Protection Directive, algorithmic decision-making, AI regulation, EU data protection law, algorithmic transparency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review