An Efficacy of Social Cognitive Theory to Predict Health Behavior A Meta-Analysis on the Health Belief Model Studies in Korea
Open accessAbstract
??? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ??????????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????????????????(Health Belief Model: HBM)??? ????????? ?????? ?????????????????? ??????????????????. ?????? ?????? 2013????????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ????????? 54???????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????????. ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????? 24.5%??? ???????????? ????????? 25.0%??? ???????????? ?????????. ???????????? ??????, ??????????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????????????????? ?????? ?????????(????????? ?????????,????????? ?????????, ????????? ??????, ???????????????)??? ????????? ????????? ????????? ?????????. ????????? ????????? ?????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????????. ?????????????????? ?????? ??? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ???????????????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??????????????? ???????????? ?????????. ???????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ????????????(??????, ????????????, ???????????? ??????), ??????, ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????????????????? ???????????????. ??? ?????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????????, ???????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ?????????????????????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ??? ????????? ??????????????????????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ??? ?????????. ?????? ????????? ??? ????????????????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????, ?????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????????
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent meta-analyses have categorized variables based on theoretical models to refine and enhance the explanatory power of the theory.
“Recent meta-analyses have been conducted by categorizing variables based on theoretical models to elaborate and increase the explanatory power of the theory used [33,34].”
Cites
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 17,604 · see citing works
Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model
Witte, K. (1992) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759209376276 · Cited by 3,880 · see citing works
On the Use of Beta Coefficients in Meta-Analysis.
Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175 · Cited by 1,643 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Health Belief Model Variables in Predicting Behavior
Carpenter, C. J. (2010) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2010.521906 · Cited by 1,604 · see citing works
Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711010x502733 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Choi, M. J., Kim, S., & Jeong, S. H. (2024) · Asian Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.anr.2024.04.007 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lee, B., 김채린, 윤문영, 김민희, 손영곤, & 이상록
- ORCID
- Byoungkwan Lee
- Venue
- Journal of Public Relations
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-206
- ISSN
- 1229-2869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2514722741
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Journal of Public Relations (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- The Royal Society of Chemistry’s Journals, Books and Databases (The Royal Society of Chemistry) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Keywords
- Health Belief Model, social cognitive theory, health behavior prediction, health behavior change, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review