CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Anarchism and Radical PoliticsOpen Source Software InnovationsKnowledge Management and Sharing

Creación, reformulación y difusión del conocimiento en las prácticas diarias de la cultura libre

Open access
Calvo, Dafne·2021·Observatorio (OBS*)
DOI 10.15847/obsobs15220211732
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Más allá de las movilizaciones más visibles, los movimientos sociales mantienen su actividad en periodos de suspensión (Taylor, 1989) o de latencia (Melucci, 1996). Esta investigación combina el concepto de prácticas diarias (Yates, 2015) con el de prácticas de conocimiento (Casas-Cortés, Osterweil y Powell, 2008) para analizar el rol de estas segundas como parte esencial de la rutina del movimiento de la cultura libre en España. A través de una metodología mixta y participativa con una muestra de 290 comunidades, los resultados identifican el papel central de la educación para la emancipación y difusión de conocimiento. Las comunidades también intercambian ideas, aprenden colectivamente y producen software libre y contenido cultural en abierto. Las prácticas diarias de estas se ven limitadas por su capital humano y cultural, así como por el contexto institucional, que señala lo que es legal y prioriza la financiación de unas acciones sobre otras.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15847/obsobs15220211732

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Álvarez Pedrosian, E. (2014). Lo urbano como laboratorio para la exploración transdiciplinaria. En E. A. Pedrosian (Ed.), Cartografía de territorios y territorialidades. Un ejercicio de integralidad en el encuentro de la geografía humana y la antropología de la comunicación (pp. 17-28). Montevideo: Espacio Interdisciplinario de la Universidad de la República.
  2. Arribas, M. (2004). Diseño y validación de cuestionarios. Matronas Profesión, 5(17), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.33.1.182391 · DOI
  3. Barbas, A., & Postill, J. (2017). Communication Activism as a School of Politics: Lessons From Spain's Indignados Movement. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 646-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12321 · DOI
  4. Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Action in the Contemporary Media Environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00340.x · DOI
  5. Cabello, F., Franco, M. G., & Haché, A. (2012). Hacia una web social libre y federada: el caso de Lorea. Teknokultura, 9(1), 19-43.
  6. Cammaerts, B. (2011). Disruptive sharing in a digital age: Rejecting neoliberalism? Continuum: Journal of media and cultural studies, 25(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2011.539157 · DOI
  7. Candón Mena, J. (2012). Soberanía tecnológica en la era de las redes. Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político, 7(1), 73-92.
  8. Casas-Cortés, M. I., Osterweil, M., & Powell, D. E. (2008). Blurring boundaries: Recognizing knowledgepractices in the study of social movements. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(1), 17-58. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2008.0006 · DOI
  9. Chesters, G. S. (2014). Social Movements and the Ethics of Knowledge Production. En K. Gillan & J. Pickeri (Eds.), Research Ethics and Social Movements: Scholarship, Activism and Knowledge Production (pp. 11-26). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs140 · DOI
  10. Choudry, A., & Kapoor, D. (2010). Learning from the Ground Up: Global Perspectives on Social Movements and Knowledge Production. En A. Choudry & D. Kapoor (Eds.), Learning from the Ground Up: Global Perspectives on Social Movements and Knowledge Production (pp. 1-16). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Contreras, R. (2002). La Investigación Acción Participativa (IAP): revisando sus metodologías y sus potencialidades. En J. Durston & F. Miranda (Eds.), Experiencias y metodología de la investigación participativa (pp. 9-18). Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
  12. Cox, L. (2014). Movements Making Knowledge: A New Wave of Inspiration for Sociology? Sociology, 48(5), 954-971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038514539063 · DOI
  13. Cox, L., & Flesher Fominaya, C. (2009). Movement Knowledge: What Do We Know, How Do We Create Knowledge and What Do We Do With it? Interface: A journal for and about social movements, 1(1), 1-20.
  14. Crabu, S., Giovanella, F., Maccari, L., & Magaudda, P. (2016). Hacktivism, Infrastructures and Legal Frameworks in Community Networks: The Italian Case of Ninux. Journal of peer production, (9).
  15. Della Porta, D., & Pavan, E. (2017). Repertoires of knowledge practices: social movements in times of crisis. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-01-2017-1483 · DOI
  16. Downing, J. (2008). Social Movement Theories and Alternative Media: An Evaluation and Critique. Communication, Culture & Critique, 1(1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17539137.2007.00005.x · DOI
  17. Duxbury, N. (2015). Positioning Cultural Mapping in Local Planning and Development Contexts: An Introduction. Culture and Local Governance, 5(1), 1-7.
  18. Esteves, A. M. (2008). Processes of Knowledge Production in Social Movements as Multi-level Power Dynamics. Sociology Compass, 2(6), 1934-1953. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17519020.2008.00146.x · DOI
  19. Firer-Blaess, S., & Fuchs, C. (2014). Wikipedia: An info-communist manifesto. Television and New Media, 15(2), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476412450193 · DOI
  20. Flesher Fominaya, C. (2015). Debunking Spontaneity: Spain's 15 -M/Indignados as Autonomous Movement. Social Movement Studies, 14(2), 142-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2014.945075 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Fuster Morell, M. (2012). The Free Culture and 15M Movements in Spain: Composition, Social Networks and Synergies. Social Movement Studies, 11(3-4), 386-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.710323 · DOI
  22. Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the Streets. Social media and Contemporary Activism. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Giraud, E. (2014). Has radical participatory online media really «failed»? Indymedia and its legacies. Convergence, 20(4), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514541352 · DOI
  24. Haro Barba, C., & Sampedro, V. (2011). Activismo político en Red: del Movimiento por la Vivienda Digna al 15M. Teknokultura, 8(2), 157-175.
  25. Hine, C. (2017). Ethnography and the Internet: Taking Account of Emerging Technological Landscapes. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(3), 315-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0178-7 · DOI
  26. Hintz, A., & Milan, S. (2009). At the margins of Internet governance: grassroots tech groups and communication policy. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 5(1-2), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.5.1 · DOI
  27. Howard, P. N. (2002). Network Ethnography and the Hypermedia Organization: New Media, New Organizations, New Methods. New Media & Society, 4(4), 550-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144402321466813 · DOI
  28. Hudig, K., & Dowling, E. (2010). Whatever Happened to the Counter-Globalization Movement? Some Reflections on Antagonism, Vanguardism, and Professionalization. En A. Choudry & D. Kapoor (Eds.), Learning from the Ground Up. Movements and Knowledge Production (pp. 69-84). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  29. Jackson, S. K., & Kuehn, K. M. (2016). Open Source, Social Activism and «Necessary Trade-offs» in the Digital Enclosure: A Case Study of Platform Co-operative, Loomio.org. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 14(2), 413 -427.
  30. Kavada, A. (2013). Internet cultures and protest movements: the cultural links between strategy, organizing and online communication. En B. Cammaerts, A. Mattoni, & P. McCurdy (Eds.), Mediation and protest movements (pp. 77-94). Intellect.
  31. Koopmans, R. (2004). Protest in Time and Space: The Evolution of Waves of Contention. En D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 19-47). Malden: Blackwell.
  32. Lim, M. (2018). Roots, Routes, and Routers: Communications and Media of Contemporary Social Movements. Journalism and Communication Monographs, 20(2), 92-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637918770419 · DOI
  33. Markham, A. N. (2005). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. En N. K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 403-416). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311420056 · DOI
  34. Mattoni, A. (2013). Repertoires of communication in social movement processes. En B. Cammaerts, A. Mattoni, & P. McCurdy (Eds.), Mediation and protest movements (pp. 39-56). Bristol: Intellect.
  35. Maxigas, P. (2012). Hacklabs and hackerspaces -tracing two genealogies. Journal of peer production, (2).
  36. McCurdy, P., Feigenbaum, A., & Frenzel, F. (2016). Protest Camps and Repertoires of Contention. Social Movement Studies, 15(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.16194/j.cnki.31-1059/g4.2011.07.016 · DOI
  37. McDonald, K. (2002). From Solidarity to Fluidarity: Social movements beyond 'collective identity' --the case of globalization conflicts. Social Movement Studies, 1(2), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474283022000010637 · DOI
  38. Melucci, A. (1985). The Symbolic Challenge of Contemporary Movements. Social Research, 52(4), 789-816. https://doi.org/10.2307/40970398 · DOI
  39. Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Oakleigh: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Milan, S. (2016). Liberated Technology: Inside Emancipatory Communication Activism. En E. Gordon & P. Mihailidis (Eds.), Civic media: technology, design, practice (pp. 107-124). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9970.003.0007 · DOI
  41. Moreno-Caballud, L. (2015). Cultures of Anyone Studies on Cultural Democratization in the Spanish Neoliberal Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  42. Ortí Mata, M., & Díaz Velázquez, E. (2012). Claves teóricas y metodológicas para la investigación acción participativa (IAP). En M. Arroyo Menéndez & I. Sádaba Rodríguez (Eds.), Metodología de la investigación social. Técnicas innovadoras y sus aplicaciones (pp. 153-174). Madrid: Síntesis.
  43. Reckwitz, A. (2004). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. Practicing History: New Directions in Historical Writing after the Linguistic Turn, 5(2), 245-263.
  44. Ryan, C., Carragee, K. M., & Meinhofer, W. (2001). Framing, the news media, and collective action. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(1), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4501 · DOI
  45. Sampedro Blanco, V. (2005). La red del 13-M. A modo de prefacio. En V. Sampedro Blanco (Ed.), 13-M: Multitudes online (pp. 11-23). Madrid: Catarata.
  46. Sandoval Casilimas, C. (1996). Investigación cualitativa. En Módulo cualitativo. https://doi.org/958-932918-7
  47. Sletto, B., Bryan, J., Torrado, M., Hale, C., & Barry, D. (2013). Territorialidad, mapeo participativo y política sobre los recursos naturales: la experiencia de América Latina. Cuadernos de Geografía, 22, 19320. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.17.1.1074 · DOI
  48. Sousa Santos, B. de. (2014). Mas allá del pensamiento abismal: de las líneas globales a una ecología de saberes. En B. de Sousa Santos & M. P. Meneses (Eds.), Espitemologías del Sur (Perspectivas) (pp. 21-66). Madrid: Akal.
  49. Stephansen, H. (2016). Understanding citizen media as practice: agents, processes, publics. En M. Baker & B. B. Blaagaard (Eds.), Citizen Media and Public Spaces: diverse expressions of citizenship and dissent (pp. 25-41). Londres: Routledge.
  50. Tarrow, S. (1993). Cycles of Collective Action: Between Moments of Madness and the Repertoire of Contention. Social Science History, 17(2), 281-307.
  51. Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power in Movement Social. Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  52. Taylor, V. (1989). Social Movement Continuity: The Women's Movement in Abeyance. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 761-775.
  53. Taylor, V., & Van Dyke, N. (2002). ''Get up, Stand up'': Tactical Repertoires of Social Movements. En The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 261-293). Malden: Blackwell.
  54. Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid Media Activism: Ecologies, Imaginaries, Algorithms. Abingdon: Routledge.
  55. Treré, E., & Barranquero, A. (2018). Tracing the roots of technopolitics: towards a North-South dialogue. En F. Sierra Caballero (Ed.), Networks, Movements and Technopolitics in Latin America. Critical Analysis and Current Challenges. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  56. Tucker, J. A., Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M. E., & Barberá, P. (2018). From Liberation to Turmoil: Social Media and Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 46-59.
  57. van Laer, J., & van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information Communication and Society, 13(8), 1146-1171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003628307 · DOI
  58. Yates, L. (2015). Everyday politics, social practices and movement networks: Daily life in Barcelona's social centres. British Journal of Sociology, 66(2), 236-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12101 · DOI
  59. Ziadah, R., & Hanieh, A. (2010). Collective Approaches to Activist Knowledge: Experiences of the New AntiApartheid Movement in Toronto. En A. Choudry & D. Kapoor (Eds.), Learning from the Ground Up. Movements and Knowledge Production (pp. 845-100). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Related

Authors
Calvo, D.
Affiliations
Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
Corresponding author
Calvo, Dafne
ORCID
Calvo, Dafne
Venue
Observatorio (OBS*)
Publisher
Instituto Universitario de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL)
Published
2021-06-23
Volume
15
Issue
2
ISSN
1646-5954 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.15847/obsobs15220211732
OpenAlex
W3176519304
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Observatorio (OBS*) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Anarchism and Radical Politics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
free culture movement, knowledge practices, everyday practices, knowledge production and dissemination, free software communities, social movements, emancipatory education, collective learning, institutional environment, Spain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review