The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Corpus-Based Study on Engagement in English Academic Writing
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These calls have gained additional support from empirical findings showing that novice (e.g., El-Dakhs, 2018a; Jin 2015) and non-native speaking writers (Ament et al., 2020;Eghtesadi & Navidinia, 2009;Ghazanfari et al., 2018;Mauranen, 1993;Vassileva, 2001) use metadiscourse differently and less effectively than expert and native-speaking writers.”
From Investigating the impact of explicit and implicit instruction on the use of interactional metadiscourse markers (2022) · cites this paper as Jin 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal
Hyland, K. (2004) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/25.2.156 · Cited by 1,241 · cited 4×
“This finding concurs with the previous studies that examined the corpus of novice writers in comparison to that of experts (Hyland, 2005b, 2009; Hyland & Tse, 2004).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNigel Gilbert, G. (1977) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631277700700112 · Cited by 691
Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles
HYLAND, K. (2001) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088301018004005 · Cited by 375 · cited 8×
“What the previous literature has mostly suggested is that there exist enormous disciplinary variations in the use of engagement resources, especially between the soft fields and the hard sciences (Hyland, 2001, 2005a, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialWhat do they mean? Questions in academic writing
HYLAND, K. (2002) · Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse · doi:10.1515/text.2002.021 · Cited by 201
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Alisha Witmer, 영어교육, 64, 173
- Bolton, K., International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7, 165, 10.1075/ijcl.7.2.02bol · DOI
- De Haan, F., Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 83
- Egbert, J., TESOL Quarterly, 41, 157, 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00044.x · DOI
- Harwood, N., Applied Linguistics, 26, 343, 10.1093/applin/ami012 · DOI
- Hu, G., Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2795, 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007 · DOI
- Hyland, K., English for Specific Purposes, 13, 239, 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3 · DOI
- Hyland, K., Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437, 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Hyland, K., Language Awareness, 9, 179, 10.1080/09658410008667145 · DOI
- Hyland, K., Applied Linguistics, 23, 215, 10.1093/applin/23.2.215 · DOI
- Hyland, K., Text, 22, 529
- Hyland, K., Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133, 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001 · DOI
- Hyland, K., Discourse Studies, 7, 173, 10.1177/1461445605050365 · DOI
- Hyland, K., Linguistics and Education, 16, 363, 10.1016/j.linged.2006.05.002 · DOI
- Hyland, K., International Journal of English Studies, 8, 1
- Kim, C. K., Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2086, 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.03.004 · DOI
- Kitagawa, C., Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 739, 10.1016/0378-2166(90)90004-W · DOI
- Kuo, C., English for Specific Purposes, 18, 121, 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6 · DOI
- Lee, S. H., Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 61, 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.001 · DOI
- McGrath, L., English for Specific Purposes, 31, 161, 10.1016/j.esp.2011.11.002 · DOI
- Nuyts, J., Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 383, 10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00009-6 · DOI
- Nystrand, M., Written Communication, 6, 66, 10.1177/0741088389006001005 · DOI · Paper page
- 오선영, 영어교육, 62, 147
- Siew Mei, W., Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 254, 10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.006 · DOI
- Swales, J. M., Applied Linguistics, 19, 97, 10.1093/applin/19.1.97 · DOI
- Thompson, G., Applied Linguistics, 22, 58, 10.1093/applin/22.1.58 · DOI
- Vande Kopple, W., College Composition and Communication, 36, 82, 10.2307/357609 · DOI
- Webber, P., English for Specific Purposes, 13, 257, 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90005-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
El-Dakhs, D. A. S., Yahya, N., & Pawlak, M. (2022) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-022-00175-0 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, H.
- Venue
- English Teaching
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 27-54
- ISSN
- 1017-7108
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
