Cited by 37Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Charting a path toward combination therapy for Alzheimer’s disease

Stephenson, Diane, Perry, Dan, Bens, Cynthia, Bain, Lisa J, Berry, Donald, Krams, Michael, Sperling, Reisa, Dilts, David +7 more·2015·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

It is acknowledged that progress in combined therapeutic approaches for Alzheimer's disease (AD) will require an unprecedented level of collaboration. At a meeting co-hosted by the Accelerate Cure/Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease Coalition and the Critical Path Institute, investigators from industry, academia and regulatory agencies agreed on the need for combinatorial approaches to treating AD. The need for advancing multiple targets includes recognition for novel adaptive trial designs that incorporate existing and new biomarkers to evaluate drug effects independently and in combination. A combination trial now being planned may test drugs targeting different pathogenic pathways or multiple targets along a common pathway. Collaborations and consortia-based strategies are pivotal for success and a regulatory framework is recommended for success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/14737175.2015.995168

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A combinatorial treatment strategy for Alzheimer disease seems more likely to yield clinical successes than monotherapy, based on treatment paradigms for other chronic diseases.

    “Using the example of treatment paradigms for other chronic diseases, such as hypertension, congestive heart failure, epilepsy, HIV and others, a combinatorial treatment strategy for AD seems more likely to yield clinical successes than monotherapy (Gauthier et al., 2019; Morris, 2019; Stephenson et al., 2015).”

    From Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies (2019) · cites this paper as Stephenson et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stephenson, D., Perry, D., Bens, C., Bain, L. J., Berry, D., Krams, M., Sperling, R., Dilts, D., Luthman, J., Hanna, D., McKew, J., Temple, R., Fields, F. O., Salloway, S., & Katz, R.
Affiliations
  • Critical Path Institute (US)
  • Alliance for Aging Research (US)
  • Berry Consultants, LLC (United States) (US)
  • Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Eisai (Japan) (JP)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • Butler Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Stephenson, Diane
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2014-12-26
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
107-113
ISSN
  • 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8360
OpenAlex
W2140132003
Cited by
37
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, combination therapy, adaptive trial design, biomarkers, clinical trial design, regulatory framework, university-industry collaboration, pathogenic pathways
MeSH terms
Academies and Institutes, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Drug and Narcotic Control, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Antipsychotic Agents, Public-Private Sector Partnerships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review