The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vaccines for fish in aquaculture
Abstract
Vaccination plays an important role in large-scale commercial fish farming and has been a key reason for the success of salmon cultivation. In addition to salmon and trout, commercial vaccines are available for channel catfish, European seabass and seabream, Japanese amberjack and yellowtail, tilapia and Atlantic cod. In general, empirically developed vaccines based on inactivated bacterial pathogens have proven to be very efficacious in fish. Fewer commercially available viral vaccines and no parasite vaccines exist. Substantial efficacy data are available for new fish vaccines and advanced technology has been implemented. However, before such vaccines can be successfully commercialized, several hurdles have to be overcome regarding the production of cheap but effective antigens and adjuvants, while bearing in mind environmental and associated regulatory concerns (e.g., those that limit the use of live vaccines). Pharmaceutical companies have performed a considerable amount of research on fish vaccines, however, limited information is available in scientific publications. In addition, salmonids dominate both the literature and commercial focus, despite their relatively small contribution to the total volume of farmed fish in the world. This review provides an overview of the fish vaccines that are currently commercially available and some viewpoints on how the field is likely to evolve in the near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Advances in Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0065-3519(99)80039-1 · Cited by 128
Shoemaker, C. A., Klesius, P. H., & Bricker, J. M. (1999) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00116-7 · Cited by 61
Cited by
Beneficial roles of feed additives as immunostimulants in aquaculture: a review
Dawood, M. A. O., Koshio, S., & Esteban, M. Á. (2018) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12209 · Cited by 921
Vibriosis in Fish: A Review on Disease Development and Prevention
Ina-Salwany, M. Y., Al-saari, N., Mohamad, A., Mursidi, F.-A., Mohd-Aris, A., Amal, M. N. A., Kasai, H., Mino, S., Sawabe, T., & Zamri-Saad, M. (2019) · Journal of Aquatic Animal Health · doi:10.1002/aah.10045 · Cited by 452
Gatesoupe, F.-J. (2008) · Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1159/000106089 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Sommerset, I., Krossøy, B., Biering, E., & Frost, P.
- Venue
- Expert Review of Vaccines
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-101
- ISSN
- 1476-0584 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-8395
- OpenAlex
- W2121336765
- Cited by
- 742
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vaccines for fish in aquaculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1586/14760584.4.1.89
- The paper
- Sommerset, I., Krossøy, B., Biering, E., & Frost, P. (2005). Vaccines for fish in aquaculture. Expert Review of Vaccines. https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.4.1.89
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.