Cited by 25Tuberous Sclerosis Complex ResearchTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Should mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors be stopped in women with lymphangioleiomyomatosis awaiting lung transplantation?

Open access
El-Chemaly, Souheil, Goldberg, Hilary J, Glanville, Allan R·2014·Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare cystic lung disease characterized by proliferation of smooth muscle like cells (LAM cells) that have mutations in the tuberous sclerosis gene (TSC2), leading to the activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Rapamycin, an inhibitor of the mTOR pathway, has been shown in a landmark clinical trial to halt the decline in lung function, as long as it is used continuously. Women with severe pulmonary LAM still progress to require lung transplantation. The use of inhibitors of the mTOR pathway immediately after transplant has been linked to bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, a potentially fatal complication of lung transplantation. Currently, it is recommended that women with LAM stop taking rapamycin once listed for lung transplant, which could potentially lead to faster lung function decline while awaiting organ transplantation. Here we review the existing evidence and discuss potential recommendations for the management of the inhibitors of the mTOR pathway while awaiting lung transplantation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/17476348.2014.956728

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Glanville AR, 2014, [Epub ahead of print]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
El-Chemaly, S., Goldberg, H. J., & Glanville, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU)
Venue
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
Published
2014-09-09
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
657-660
ISSN
  • 1747-6348 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-6356
OpenAlex
W2136681516
Cited by
25
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Keywords
lymphangioleiomyomatosis, mTOR inhibitors, rapamycin, lung transplantation, pre-transplant management, TSC2 mutation, lung function decline, women
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Lung Transplantation, Lymphangioleiomyomatosis, Sirolimus, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review