The absolute reliability of evaluation
Open accessAbstract
根拠ある理学療法の確立のため，近年，理学療法評価法の信頼性を検討する報告が多くなっている．信頼性の検討方法には相対信頼性を用いるものと絶対信頼性を用いるものがある．理学療法評価法の信頼性の検討の多くは前者であるが，評価方法を臨床応用する場合，後者は前者に比べて多くの有益な情報を与えてくれる．本稿では誤差の種類について概説した後，絶対信頼性の検討方法であるBland-Altman分析及び最小可検変化量について説明する．
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When the J-EACQ total score decreases five points following an ACT intervention, it cannot be concluded whether the pre-post change is a true decline in experiential avoidance or is within the error margin of the J-EACQ.
“when the J-EACQ total score decreases five points following the ACT intervention, it is not possible to conclude whether the pre-post change observed is true decline in EA (i.e., the intervention was effective) or with in the error margin of the J-EACQ (i.e., the intervention was not effective).”
From Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the experiential avoidance in caregiving questionnaire (EACQ) (2023) · cites this paper as Shimoi, 2011
In the error-range estimation discussion (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable), Shimoi explains that a measured change must be compared with the estimated error range before it can be judged a true change. The paper does not address the J-EACQ, ACT, experiential avoidance, or whether a five-point J-EACQ decrease falls within that scale’s error margin. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBecause calculation of the SDC is not appropriate when systematic error is present, the LOA is used as a substitute for the SDC.
“Because calculation of the SDC is not appropriate when systematic error is present, the LOA is used as a substitute for the SDC (Shimoi, 2011).”
From Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the experiential avoidance in caregiving questionnaire (EACQ) (2023) · cites this paper as Shimoi, 2011
Systematic error raises serious concerns because it is difficult to resolve by repeated measurements and can bias interpretation of results.
“the systematic error raises serious concerns since it is difficult to be resolved by repeated measurements and this can bias interpretation of the results (Shimoi, 2011).”
From Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the experiential avoidance in caregiving questionnaire (EACQ) (2023) · cites this paper as Shimoi, 2011
If a change in scores on a scale is greater than the value of the SDC or LOA, the change can be regarded as a true change.
“If a change in scores on the scale is greater than the value of the SDC or LOA, this change can be regarded as a true change (Shimoi, 2011).”
From Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the experiential avoidance in caregiving questionnaire (EACQ) (2023) · cites this paper as Shimoi, 2011
The SDC and LOA provide indices for determining whether a change in scores on a scale can be considered true change, and play similar roles to the reliable change index.
“The SDC and LOA provide indices determining whether the change in scores in a scale can be considered true change or not (Shimoi, 2011) and play similar roles to the reliable change index (Jacobson & Truax, 1991).”
From Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the experiential avoidance in caregiving questionnaire (EACQ) (2023) · cites this paper as Shimoi, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965 · see citing works
Interpreting Change Scores of Tests and Measures Used in Physical Therapy
Haley, S. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A. (2006) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/86.5.735 · Cited by 940 · see citing works
Steffen, T. M., & Seney, M. (2008) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20070214 · Cited by 862 · see citing works
de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Ostelo, R., Beckerman, H., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-54 · Cited by 832 · see citing works
Cella, D. F., Eton, D. T., Lai, J., Peterman, A. H., & Merkel, D. E. (2002) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00529-8 · Cited by 808 · see citing works
Stratford, P. W., & Goldsmith, C. H. (1997) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/77.7.745 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Statistical Techniques For Comparing Measurers And Methods Of Measurement: A Critical Review
Ludbrook, J. (2002) · Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1681.2002.03686.x · Cited by 450 · see citing works
SPECIAL ARTICLE COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT
Ludbrook, J. (1997) · Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1681.1997.tb01807.x · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale
Stevenson, T. J. (2001) · Australian Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60296-8 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Stratford, P. W. (2004) · Physiotherapy Canada · doi:10.2310/6640.2004.15377 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Clinimetric Properties of the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment
Faber, M. J., Bosscher, R. J., & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (2006) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/86.7.944 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Wagner, J. M., Rhodes, J. A., & Patten, C. (2008) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20070255 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Fulk, G. D., & Echternach, J. L. (2008) · Neurology Report · doi:10.1097/npt0b013e31816593c0 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Rogers, P., Burke, V., Stroud, P., & Puddey, I. B. (1999) · Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03059.x · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The Intra-rater and the Inter-rater Reliability of Tandem Gait Test with the Bland-Altman Analysis
下井, 俊., & Hiroaki, T. A. N. I. (2008) · Rigakuryoho Kagaku · doi:10.1589/rika.23.625 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The Absolute Reliabitily of Two Different Tandem Gait Tests with Minimal Detectable Change
下井, 俊., & Hiroaki, T. A. N. I. (2010) · Rigakuryoho Kagaku · doi:10.1589/rika.25.49 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morimoto, H., Kishita, N., Kondo, H., Tanaka, N., Abe, Y., & Muto, T. (2023) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.02.003 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“The SDC and LOA suggested that if there is a change in scores over 7 points for the active avoidant behaviors subscale, over 6 points for the intolerance of internal experiences and apprehension concerning Note .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMorimoto, H., Kishita, N., Kondo, H., & Muto, T. (2023) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2022.2163951 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- SHIMOI, T.
- Affiliations
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Science, International University of Health and Welfare
- Venue
- Rigakuryoho Kagaku
- Publisher
- Society of Physical Therapy Science
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 451-461
- ISSN
- 1341-1667 (ISSN-L)
- 2434-2807
- OpenAlex
- W2333107271
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Rigakuryoho Kagaku (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- physiotherapy assessment, absolute reliability, relative reliability, measurement error, Bland-Altman analysis, minimal detectable change, inter-rater reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
