Cited by 24Mangiferin and Mango ExtractsMedicinal Plant ResearchBioactive natural compounds

The anti-inflammatory activity of standard aqueous stem bark extract of Mangifera indica L. as evident in inhibition of Group IA sPLA2

Open access
DHANANJAYA, BHADRAPURA LAKKAPPA, SHIVALINGAIAH, SUDHARSHAN·2016·Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências

Abstract

ABSTRACT The standard aqueous stem bark extract is consumed as herbal drink and used in the pharmaceutical formulations to treat patients suffering from various disease conditions in Cuba. This study was carried out to evaluate the modulatory effect of standard aqueous bark extract of M. indica on Group IA sPLA2. M. indica extract, dose dependently inhibited the GIA sPLA2 (NN-XIa-PLA2) activity with an IC50 value 8.1 µg/ml. M. indica extract effectively inhibited the indirect hemolytic activity up to 98% at ~40 µg/ml concentration and at various concentrations (0-50 µg/ml), it dose dependently inhibited the edema formation. When examined as a function of increased substrate and calcium concentration, there was no relieve of inhibitory effect on the GIA sPLA2. Furthermore, the inhibition was irreversible as evidenced from binding studies. It is observed that the aqueous extract ofM. indica effectively inhibits sPLA2 and it is associated inflammatory activities, which substantiate their anti-inflammatory properties. The mode of inhibition could be due to direct interaction of components present in the extract, with sPLA2 enzyme. Further studies on understanding the principal constituents, responsible for the anti-inflammatory activity would be interesting to develop this into potent anti-inflammatory agent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/0001-3765201620140574

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 24

Authors
DHANANJAYA, B. L., & SHIVALINGAIAH, S.
Affiliations
  • Jain University (IN)
  • Adichunchanagiri Biotechnology and Cancer Research Institute, India
Venue
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
Published
2016-03-04
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
197-209
ISSN
  • 0001-3765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1678-2690
OpenAlex
W2331660773
Cited by
24
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Jain University
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Mangiferin and Mango Extracts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioactive natural compounds
Keywords
mango, anti-inflammatory activity, edema inhibition, herbal medicine, enzyme inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Edema, Hemolysis, Plant Extracts, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Plant Bark, Mangifera, Mice, Group II Phospholipases A2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review