Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maternal consumption of ultra-processed foods and newborn exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)

Naspolini, Nathalia Ferrazzo, Machado, Priscila Pereira, Moreira, Josino Costa, Asmus, Carmen Ildes Rodrigues Fróes, Meyer, Armando·2021·Cadernos de Saúde Pública

Abstract

Abstract: Evolving evidence shows that ultra-processed food consumption may increase exposure to chemicals used in food packaging and production, such as per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances, phthalates, and bisphenols. Studies suggested that these contaminants may be transferred from mother to child through placenta, increasing concerns for both maternal and child health. This study aimed to investigate the association of maternal consumption of ultra-processed foods with newborn exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the PIPA Project (The Rio Birth Cohort Study on Environmental Exposure and Childhood Development). The pilot cohort study conducted with 131 pregnant women-child pairs in a public maternity school in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, was assessed. Maternal dietary intake in the third trimester of pregnancy was evaluated using a qualitative food frequency questionnaire. Food items were classified as non-ultra-processed food and ultra-processed food using the NOVA system and regular consumption of ultra-processed foods was estimated. Newborns of pregnant women who weekly consumed three or more subgroups of ultra-processed food presented the highest level of PFAS (2.47ng/mL; 95%CI: 1.22; 3.72), compared to non-consumption of ultra-processed food investigated (0 ultra-processed food = 1.86ng/mL; 95%CI: 1.38; 2.50). Additionally, cluster analysis grouped ultra-processed food, fish, and PFAS levels. In conclusion, we found increased levels of PFAS in newborns whose mothers were higher consumers of ultra-processed foods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/0102-311x00152021

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During pregnancy, an increased UPF intake was associated with greater maternal concentrations of phthalates and umbilical cord PFAS.

    “During pregnancy, an increased UPF intake was associated with greater maternal concentrations of phthalates 74 and umbilical cord PFAS.75”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Lane MM, 2021, Ultraprocessed food and chronic noncommunicable diseases a systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 observational studies, Obes Rev, 22
  2. Martinez Steele E, 2020, Association between dietary contribution of ultra-processed foods and urinary concentrations of phthalates and bisphenol in a nationally representative sample of the US population aged 6 years and older, PLoS One, 15, 10.1371/journal.pone.0236738 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ojha S, 2013, Suboptimal maternal nutrition affects offspring health in adult life, Early Hum Dev, 89, 909, 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.08.022 · DOI
  4. Filardi T, 2020, Bisphenol A and phthalates in diet an emerging link with pregnancy complications, Nutrients, 12, 525, 10.3390/nu12020525 · DOI
  5. Naspolini NF, 2021, Food consumption according to the degree of processing, dietary diversity and socio-demographic factors among pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil the Rio Birth Cohort Study of Environmental Exposure and Childhood Development (PIPA project), Nutr Health, 27, 79, 10.1177/0260106020960881 · DOI
  6. Asmus CIRF, 2020, Rio Birth Cohort Study on Environmental Exposure and Childhood Development - PIPA Project, Ann Glob Health, 86, 59, 10.5334/aogh.2709 · DOI
  7. Ashley-Martin J, 2014, A birth cohort study to investigate the association between prenatal phthalate and bisphenol A exposures and fetal markers of metabolic dysfunction, Environ Health, 13, 84, 10.1186/1476-069X-13-84 · DOI
  8. Rancière F, 2015, Bisphenol A and the risk of cardiometabolic disorders a systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence, Environ Health, 14, 46, 10.1186/s12940-015-0036-5 · DOI
  9. Radke EG, 2019, Phthalate exposure and metabolic effects a systematic review of the human epidemiological evidence, Environ Int, 132, 104768, 10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.040 · DOI
  10. Shoshtari-Yeganeh B, 2019, Systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between phthalates exposure and insulin resistance, Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 26, 9435, 10.1007/s11356-019-04373-1 · DOI
  11. Buckley JP, 2019, Ultra-processed food consumption and exposure to phthalates and bisphenols in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-2014, Environ Int, 131, 105057, 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105057 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Boisvert G, 2019, Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of perfluoroalkyl acids and precursors in East Greenland polar bears and their ringed seal prey, Environ Pollut, 252, 1335, 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.035 · DOI
  13. Philips EM, 2017, Effects of early exposure to phthalates and bisphenols on cardiometabolic outcomes in pregnancy and childhood, Reprod Toxicol, 68, 105, 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.08.015 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Naspolini, N. F., Machado, P. P., Moreira, J. C., Asmus, C. I. R. F., & Meyer, A.
Affiliations
  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brazil
  • Deakin University, Australia
  • Vice-presidência de Serviços de Referência e Ambiente Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brasil
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de janeiro, Brazil
Venue
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Published
2021
Volume
37
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 1678-4464
  • 0102-311X
Cited by
22
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review