Cited by 99Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationClinical practice guidelines implementationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Future of the Language Models in Healthcare: The Role of Chatgpt

Open access
Tustumi, Francisco, Andreollo, Nelson Adami, Aguilar-Nascimento, José Eduardo de·2023·ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)

Abstract

The field of medicine has always been at the forefront of technological innovation, constantly seeking new strategies to diagnose, treat, and prevent diseases. Guidelines for clinical practice to orientate medical teams regarding diagnosis, treatment, and prevention measures have increased over the years. The purpose is to gather the most medical knowledge to construct an orientation for practice. Evidence-based guidelines follow several main characteristics of a systematic review, including systematic and unbiased search, selection, and extraction of the source of evidence. In recent years, the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has provided clinicians and patients with access to personalized, data-driven insights, support and new opportunities for healthcare professionals to improve patient outcomes, increase efficiency, and reduce costs. One of the most exciting developments in Artificial Intelligence has been the emergence of chatbots. A chatbot is a computer program used to simulate conversations with human users. Recently, OpenAI, a research organization focused on machine learning, developed ChatGPT, a large language model that generates human-like text. ChatGPT uses a type of AI known as a deep learning model. ChatGPT can quickly search and select pieces of evidence through numerous databases to provide answers to complex questions, reducing the time and effort required to research a particular topic manually. Consequently, language models can accelerate the creation of clinical practice guidelines. While there is no doubt that ChatGPT has the potential to revolutionize the way healthcare is delivered, it is essential to note that it should not be used as a substitute for human healthcare professionals. Instead, ChatGPT should be considered a tool that can be used to augment and support the work of healthcare professionals, helping them to provide better care to their patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/0102-672020230002e1727

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 99

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Aydın Ö Karaarslan E OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: digital twin in healthcare Aydın Ö Emerging computer technologies Tire İzmir Akademi Dernegi 2022 22 31
  2. [5]Boland A Dickson R Cherry G Doing a systematic review: a student's guide Doing a systematic review 2nd edition SAGE Publications 2017 1 304

Authors
Tustumi, F., Andreollo, N. A., & Aguilar-Nascimento, J. E. D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Brazil
Corresponding author
Tustumi, Francisco
Venue
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
Published
2023
Volume
36
Pages
e1727-e1727
ISSN
  • 0102-6720 (ISSN-L)
  • 2317-6326
OpenAlex
W4376132115
Cited by
99
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 16
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ABCD Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models, chatbots, artificial intelligence in healthcare, evidence-based medicine, guideline development, clinical decision support, human-AI collaboration
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Language, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review