Cited by 14Maternal and Neonatal HealthcarePublic Health and NutritionIron Metabolism and Disorders

Factors associated with non-adherence to prescribed iron supplement use: a study with pregnant women in the city of Rio de Janeiro

Open access
Niquini, Roberta Pereira, Bittencourt, Sonia Duarte de Azevedo, Lacerda, Elisa Maria de Aquino, Saunders, Cláudia, Leal, Maria do Carmo·2016·Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: to identify factors associated with non-use of iron supplements (IS) by pregnant women attending National Health System (SUS) prenatal care in the Municipality of Rio de Janeiro. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted in 2007/2008 with a representative sample of pregnant women using SUS hospitals and basic care in the Municipality of Rio de Janeiro. The group that had gestational age of ≥ 20 weeks at the time of the interview and who had been prescribed IS (n=1407) was subjected to a Poisson multiple regression model to estimate the association between use and independent variables. Results: of the 1407 pregnant women, 65% reported use of IS. Younger age, black skin/race, larger number of births, not having received guidance on use of IS, not having tried to obtain IS at the SUS (with a stronger association between pregnant women with lower levels of education and lower household assets indicator - HAI) and not having been able to obtain them at the SUS (amongpregnant women with lower HAI) were significantly associated with non-use. Conclusions: the guidance of health professionals regarding use of IS and their regular availability may increase adherence to prescription among pregnant women and prevent iron deficiency anemia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1806-93042016000200007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Niquini, R. P., Bittencourt, S. D. D. A., Lacerda, E. M. D. A., Saunders, C., & Leal, M. D. C.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • ENSP-Fiocruz, Brazil
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Corresponding author
Niquini, Roberta Pereira
Venue
Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil
Published
2016-06
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
189-199
ISSN
1519-3829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2485063160
Cited by
14
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Keywords
iron supplements, medication adherence, pregnant women, prenatal care, iron deficiency anemia, Unified Health System (SUS), health professional guidance, socioeconomic factors, household assets, Rio de Janeiro

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review