Cited by 154Medication Adherence and ComplianceGlobal Maternal and Child HealthPublic Health and Nutrition

Determinants of compliance with iron supplementation among pregnant women in Senegal

Open access
Seck, Binetou C, Jackson, Robert T·2008·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Background: Community iron supplementation programmes for pregnant women have lacked effectiveness, partly because of low compliance. Objective: To determine factors that influence compliance among pregnant women in Senegal. Design: Two hundred and twenty-one pregnant women, recruited from six health centres in Dakar during their first prenatal visit, were randomly assigned to receive either a prescription to purchase iron/folic acid tablets (control, n = 112) to be taken daily, according to official policy, or to receive free tablets (treatment, n = 109). Compliance was assessed 20 weeks after enrolment through interviews and pill count. Women with low or high compliance (<70% or ≥70%) were asked to explain what influenced their adherence to supplementation. Results: Overall compliance was 69%; it was significantly higher in the treatment than in the control group (86% vs. 48%; P < 0.0001). Women with high compliance (58%) were motivated by: (1) the perception of improved health upon taking the tablets (treatment = 24%, control = 10%); (2) the insistence by midwives that they take the tablets; and (3) the mention that the tablets would improve health. Women with low compliance (42%) reported: (1) the experience of side-effects that they associated with the tablets (treatment = 13%, control = 14%); (2) misunderstanding that they needed to continue taking the tablets throughout pregnancy (treatment = 0%, control = 18%); and (3) forgetfulness. Conclusion: Compliance with iron/folic acid supplementation in Senegal can be increased by providing women with clear instructions about tablet intake and educating them on the health benefits of the tablets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980007000924

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seck, B. C., & Jackson, R. T.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Seck, Binetou C
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2008-06
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
596-605
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2035452438
Cited by
154
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
Keywords
iron supplementation, folic acid, medication adherence, pregnant women, prenatal care, free medication, pill count, adverse effects, health education, midwife counseling, Senegal
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Folic Acid, Folic Acid Deficiency, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Senegal, Anemia, Iron-Deficiency, Iron, Dietary, Dietary Supplements, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review