CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40Workplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and BurnoutOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aspectos psicossociais do trabalho e transtornos mentais comuns entre trabalhadores da saúde: contribuições da análise de modelos combinados

Open access
Araújo, Tânia Maria de, Mattos, Amália Ivine Santana, Almeida, Maura Maria Guimarães de, Santos, Kionna Oliveira Bernardes·2016·Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
DOI 10.1590/1980-5497201600030014
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:: The objective was to evaluate the contribution of the combined analysis of psychosocial stress at work and its association with common mental disorders (CMD) among health workers. METHODS:: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a representative sample of primary care workers from five counties in the state of Bahia, Brazil. The outcome variable - CMD - was assessed by the SRQ-20. The exposure models were the demand-control and effort-reward imbalance. RESULTS:: The partial and complete performance of the models and the combination of partial models were evaluated. The adjusted prevalence ratios were obtained by Poisson regression with robust variance method. The overall prevalence of CMDs was 21.0% and was associated with high strain and high effort-reward imbalance (ERI). The results demonstrated improved performance of the full ERI and the combination of partial models to predict the event. CONCLUSION:: Thus, combined models are able to provide better estimates of the effects of stressful experiences in the work environment and the consequences on workers' health, offering greater contributions to this field of knowledge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1980-5497201600030014

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Johnson J, 1991, Collective control: strategies for the survival in the workplace, 121
  2. Pierantoni CR, 2004, Recursos humanos e gestão do trabalho em saúde: da teoria para a prática, 51

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Araújo, T. M. D., Mattos, A. I. S., Almeida, M. M. G. D., & Santos, K. O. B.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (BR)
  • Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
ORCID
Venue
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
Publisher
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Published
2016-09
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
645-657
ISSN
  • 1415-790X (ISSN-L)
  • 1980-5497
DOI
10.1590/1980-5497201600030014
OpenAlex
W2555744043
Cited by
40
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
common mental disorders, healthcare workers, primary care providers, effort-reward imbalance, demand-control model, occupational stress, workplace mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Occupational Diseases, Stress, Psychological, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review