Cited by 13Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

ECI-4 screening of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and co-morbidity in Mexican preschool children: preliminary results

Open access
Poblano, Adrián, Romero, Erika·2006·Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine prospectively usefulness of Early Childhood Inventory-4 (ECI-4) in identifying attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and conduct disorder (CD). METHOD: A sample of children <6 years of age were evaluated in school settings with ECI-4 and results compared with those of Conners Rating Scales-Revised (CRS-R) 6 months later. Sample consisted of 34 healthy children (20 boys, 14 girls) prospectively followed-up. RESULTS: Frequency of children fulfill DSM-IV AD-HD criteria in ECI-4 parent scale was 17%, and in teacher scale was 32%. Frequency of children fulfill DSM-IV AD-HD criteria in parent CRS-R was 20%, and for teacher questionnaire was 23%. Correlations were significant among teacher ECI-4 and both teacher and parent CRS-R scales. Sensitivity and specificity of teacher and parent ECI-4 scales were not good. Frequency of ODD identified in parent ECI-4 scale was 5%, and for teacher 17%. Frequency of ODD in CRS-R for parents and teachers questionnaires was 17%. CD was not identified by parents in ECI-4 scale, but in teacher scale frequency was 14%. CONCLUSION: These facts support partially the use of ECI-4 screening of ADHD in Spanish-speaking preschool children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0004-282x2006000600008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The diagnostic criteria for ADHD (DSM-5) can be applied to preschool-aged children.

    “There is evidence that the diagnostic criteria for ADHD can be applied to preschool-aged children.33–39”

    From Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Results report applying DSM-IV ADHD symptom criteria to preschool children, which supports the citing sentence’s general point. The paper does not address DSM-5, as specified in the supplied claim. The Discussion also says that the validity of very early ADHD diagnoses remains open to debate and that screening cannot itself provide a clinical diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4 t h edition (DSM-IV). Washington: A m e r i c a n Psychiatric Association, 1994.
  2. Keenan K, Shaw DS, Walsh B, Delliquadri E, Giovanelli J. DSM-III-R disorders in preschool children from low-income families. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36:620-627.
  3. Lahey BB, Pelham WE, Stein MA, et al. Validity of DSM-IV attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder for younger children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1998;37:695-702.
  4. Lahey BB, Pelham WE, Loney J, et al. Three-year predictive validity of DSM-IV attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children diagnosed at 4-6 years of age. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:2014-2020.
  5. Ramey CT, Campbell FA, Ramey SL. Early intervention: successful pathways to improve intellectual development. Dev Neuro p s y c h o l 1999;16:385-392.
  6. Fletcher TV, Klinger Kaufman de Lopez C. A Mexican perspective on learning disabilities. J Learn Disab 1995;28:530-534.
  7. Keenan K, Wakschlag LS. Can a valid diagnosis of disruptive behav- ior disorder be made in preschool children? Am J Psychiatry 2002;159: 351-358.
  8. Sprafkin J, Volpe RJ, Gadow KD, Nolan EE, Kelly K. A DSM-IV-refer- enced screening instrument for preschool children: the Early Childhood Inventory-4. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002;41:604-612.
  9. Conners K. Clinical use of rating scales in diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disord e r. Pediatr Clin N Am 1999;46: 857-870.
  10. Angold A, Pre n d e rgast M, Cox A, Harrington R, Rutter M. The child and adolescent psychiatric assessment (CAPA). Psychol Med 1995;25: 739-753.
  11. Conners K, Sitarenios G, Parker J, Epstein J. Revision and restandard- ization of the Conners teacher rating scale (CTRS-R): factor structure, re l i a b i l i t y, and criterion validity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1998;26:279- 291.
  12. Conners K, Sitarenios G, Parker J, Epstein J. Revision and restandard- ization of the Conners parent rating scale (CPRS-R): factor stru c t u re , re l i a b i l i t y, and criterion validity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1998;26:257- 268.
  13. Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical biostatistics (in Spanish). Mexico: Manual Moderno, 1997.
  14. Gadow KD, Nolan EE. Diff e rences between preschool children with ODD, ADHD and ODD+ADHD symptoms. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2002;43:191-201.
  15. DuPaul GJ, McGoey KE, Eckert TL, VanBrankle J. Preschool childre n with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: impairments in behav- ioral, social, and school functioning. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychia- try 2001;40:508-515.
  16. Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.
  17. Gadow KD, Nolan EE, Litcher L, et al. Comparison of attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms subtypes in Ukranian school- children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;39:1520-1527.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poblano, A., & Romero, E.
Affiliations
Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación (MX)
Venue
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
Published
2006-12
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
932-936
ISSN
0004-282X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166373786
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, screening, preschool children, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, comorbidities, parent and teacher ratings, sensitivity and specificity, Spanish-speaking children
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Preschool, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Mexico, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sensitivity and Specificity, Comorbidity, Conduct Disorder, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review