Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aplicação da versão em português do instrumento de avaliação de qualidade de vida da Organização Mundial da Saúde (WHOQOL-100)

Open access
Fleck, Marcelo P. A, Lousada, Sérgio, Xavier, Martha, Chachamovich, Eduardo, Vieira, Guilherme, Santos, Lyssandra, Pinzon, Vanessa·1999·Revista de Saúde Pública

Abstract

INTRODUÇÃO: O Grupo de Qualidade de Vida da OMS desenvolveu um instrumento de avaliação de Qualidade de Vida, o WHOQOL-100 que está traduzido para 20 idiomas (WHOQOL GROUP, 1998). A aplicação do instrumento na versão em português é o objetivo do trabalho. MÉTODOS: Foram aplicados em 250 pacientes provenientes de quatro grandes áreas médicas (psiquiatria, clínica, cirurgia e ginecologia) de um hospital de clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, e em 50 voluntários-controles o Instrumento de Avaliação de Qualidade de Vida da OMS (WHOQOL-100), o Inventário de Beck para a depressão (BDI) e a Escala de Desesperança de Beck (BHS). RESULTADOS E CONCLUSÕES:O Instrumento mostrou bom desempenho psicométrico com características satisfatórias de consistência interna, validade discriminante, validade de critério, validade concorrente e fidedignidade teste-reteste. Concluiu-se que o instrumento está em condições de ser usado no Brasil, sendo importante avaliar seu desempenho em outras regiões e em diferentes amostras de indivíduos.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0034-89101999000200012

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fleck, M. P. A., Lousada, S., Xavier, M., Chachamovich, E., Vieira, G., Santos, L., & Pinzon, V.
Venue
Revista de Saúde Pública
Published
1999-04
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
198-205
ISSN
0034-8910 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088158553
Cited by
359
References
2
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.