Cited by 3,802Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties

The Whoqol Group·1998·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

This paper reports on the field testing, empirical derivation and psychometric properties of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life assessment (the WHOQOL). The steps are presented from the development of the initial pilot version of the instrument to the field trial version, the so-called WHOQOL-100. The instrument has been developed collaboratively in a number of centres in diverse cultural settings over several years; data are presented on the performance of the instrument in 15 different settings worldwide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00009-4

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The Whoqol Group
Corresponding author
The Whoqol Group
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-06
Volume
46
Issue
12
Pages
1569-1585
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153037374
Cited by
3,802
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 129 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 219 · 2023: 280 · 2022: 274 · 2021: 247 · 2020: 271 · 2019: 218 · 2018: 193 · 2017: 189 · 2016: 177 · 2015: 148 · 2014: 148 · 2013: 155 · 2012: 145
FWCI
56.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
WHOQOL, quality of life assessment, psychometric properties, WHOQOL-100, instrument development, field testing, cross-cultural validation, health-related quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Pilot Projects, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Translations, World Health Organization, Reproducibility of Results, Chi-Square Distribution, Cultural Diversity, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review