Cited by 7Healthcare Systems and ReformsHealthcare Systems and PracticesGlobal Health Workforce Issues

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

Superar la fragmentación y avanzar hacia la cobertura universal: claves desde Ghana, Sudáfrica y la República Unida de Tanzanía

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1590/s0042-96862008001100017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McIntyre, D., Garshong, B., Mtei, G., Meheus, F., Thiede, M., Akazili, J., Ally, M., Aikins, M., Mulligan, J.-A., & Goudge, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Ifakara Health Institute (TZ)
  • Royal Tropical Institute (NL)
  • Ghana Health Service (GH)
  • Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (TZ)
  • University of Ghana (GH)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Venue
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Publisher
World Health Organization
Published
2008-11-01
Volume
86
Issue
11
Pages
871-876
ISSN
0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2615471783
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Bulletin of the World Health Organization (cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health Workforce Issues
Keywords
universal health coverage, care fragmentation, health system integration, health policy, Ghana, South Africa, Tanzania

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review