Cited by 3Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementFungal Plant Pathogen ControlCoconut Research and Applications

Processamento mínimo, atmosfera modificada, produtos químicos e resfriamento no controle da podridão basal pós-colheita em frutos do coqueiro anão verde

Open access
Viana, Francisco Marto Pinto, Uchôa, Cleilson Nascimento, Vieira, Icaro Gusmão Pinto, Freire, Francisco Chagas Oliveira, Saraiva, Heliel Atila Oliveira, Mendes, Francisca Noelia Pinto·2008·Summa Phytopathologica

Abstract

O trabalho teve o objetivo de investigar, isolada e integradamente, o efeito do corte polar do coco verde, a atmosfera modificada, e a associação de produtos químicos, sob condições de câmara frigorífica no controle da podridão basal pós-colheita causada por Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Frutos provenientes de áreas infestadas foram cortados transversalmente, removendo-se as brácteas e, em seguida, foram submetidos aos tratamentos com ceras e fungicidas. Após o tratamento, esses frutos foram embalados em caixas de papelão e transferidos para a câmara frigorífica à ±12º C por 30 ou 35 dias, de acordo com o ensaio. As avaliações foram realizadas a cada dois dias. A exclusão do fungo por meio do corte do mesocarpo na região das brácteas do coco verde foi eficiente no controle da doença, e a proteção com a cera EF-1 foi excelente protetor contra o dano pelo frio e fungos deteriorantes nos frutos cortados. Também, verificou-se que a associação corte basal do fruto + emulsão de cera + fungicida foi uma excelente alternativa de conservação e controle da doença em estudo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0100-54052008000400005

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Immersion in carnauba wax emulsion maintains the freshness of partially husked young tender coconuts for up to 30 days at 12 °C.

    “Finally, immersion in carnauba wax emulsion maintains the freshness of partially husked young tender coconuts for up to 30 days at 12 °C [24].”

    From Coconut water preservation and processing: a review (2012) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Viana, F. M. P., Uchôa, C. N., Vieira, I. G. P., Freire, F. C. O., Saraiva, H. A. O., & Mendes, F. N. P.
Affiliations
  • Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Lavras
  • PADETEC - Parque de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico
Venue
Summa Phytopathologica
Published
2008-12
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
326-331
ISSN
0100-5405 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010081590
Cited by
3
References
10
Citations by year
2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Summa Phytopathologica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
Keywords
green coconut, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, modified atmosphere packaging, wax coating, fungicides, cold storage, fruit preservation, disease control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review