Cited by 36Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Endogenous opiate analgesia induced by tonic immobility in guinea pigs

Open access
Leite-Panissi, C.R.A., Rodrigues, C.L., Brentegani, M.R., Menescal-de-Oliveira, L.·2001·Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research

Abstract

A function of the endogenous analgesic system is to prevent recuperative behaviors generated by tissue damage, thus preventing the emission of species-specific defensive behaviors. Activation of intrinsic nociception is fundamental for the maintenance of the behavioral strategy adopted. Tonic immobility (TI) is an inborn defensive behavior characterized by a temporary state of profound and reversible motor inhibition elicited by some forms of physical restraint. We studied the effect of TI behavior on nociception produced by the formalin and hot-plate tests in guinea pigs. The induction of TI produced a significant decrease in the number of flinches (18 +/- 6 and 2 +/- 1 in phases 1 and 2) and lickings (6 +/- 2 and 1 +/- 1 in phases 1 and 2) in the formalin test when compared with control (75 +/- 13 and 22 +/- 6 flinches in phases 1 and 2; 28 +/- 7 and 17 +/- 7 lickings in phases 1 and 2). In the hot-plate test our results also showed antinociceptive effects of TI, with an increase in the index of analgesia 30 and 45 min after the induction of TI (0.67 +/- 0.1 and 0.53 +/- 0.13, respectively) when compared with control (-0.10 +/- 0.08 at 30 min and -0.09 +/- 0.09 at 45 min). These effects were reversed by pretreatment with naloxone (1 mg/kg, ip), suggesting that the hypoalgesia observed after induction of TI behavior, as evaluated by the algesimetric formalin and hot-plate tests, is due to activation of endogenous analgesic mechanisms involving opioid synapses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0100-879x2001000200013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The antinociceptive response elicited during tonic immobility is opioid mediated and involves activation of the PAG and the rostral ventromedial medulla pain circuit.

    “The antinociceptive response elicited during tonic immobility is opioid mediated103,104 and involves activation of the PAG and the rostral ventromedial medulla pain circuit.71”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [104]

  • Decreased body sway and heart rate (bradycardic effect) have been demonstrated in response to threatening stimuli (pictures of angry faces or of mutilation), social-threat stimuli, and states of anticipatory anxiety.

    “Decreased body sway and heart rate (bradycardic effect) have been demonstrated in response to threatening stimuli (pictures of angry faces or of mutilation), social-threat stimuli, and states of anticipatory anxiety.73–81”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [81]

    The Introduction describes freezing and tonic immobility as defensive responses to danger, but does not report body sway or heart rate. The Results concern pain responses in guinea pigs; our copy does not address bradycardia or responses to threatening pictures, social threats, or anticipatory anxiety (searched for body sway, heart rate, bradycardia, and those stimuli). (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Basbaum AI & Fields HL (1984). Endoge- nous pain control systems: brain-stem spi- nal pathways and endorphin circuitry. An- nual Review of Neuroscience, 7: 309-338.
  2. Watkins LR & Mayer DJ (1986). Multiple endogenous opiate and nonopiate analge- sic systems: evidence of their existence and clinical implications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 467: 273-299.
  3. Blanchard DC & Blanchard RJ (1988). Ethoexperimental approaches of the biol- ogy of emotion. Annual Review of Psy- chology, 39: 43-68.
  4. Amir S (1986). Catalepsy induced by body pinch: relation to stress induced analge- sia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 467: 226-237.
  5. LeDoux JE, Iwata J, Cicchetti P & Reis DJ (1988). Different projections of the cen- tral amygdaloid nucleus mediate auto- nomic and behavioral correlates of condi- tioned fear. Journal of Neuroscience, 8: 2517-2529.
  6. Fanselow MS (1994). Neural organization of the defensive behavior system respon- sible for fear. Psychonomic Bulletin & Re- view, 1: 429-438.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leite-Panissi, C. R. A., Rodrigues, C. L., Brentegani, M. R., & Menescal-de-Oliveira, L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Published
2001-02
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
245-250
ISSN
0100-879X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163882019
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
tonic immobility, nociception, formalin test, hot plate test, naloxone, defensive behavior, licking behavior, opioid receptors, guinea pig
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Guinea Pigs, Immobilization, Male, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review