Cited by 12Taxation and Compliance StudiesEconomic and Fiscal StudiesFiscal Policy and Economic Growth

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Os efeitos dos parcelamentos sobre a arrecadação tributária

Open access
Paes, Nelson Leitão·2014·Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo)

Abstract

Este artigo avaliou qual o impacto que os parcelamentos concedidos tiveram sobre o comportamento do contribuinte e da arrecadação. Verificou-se que o hiato tributário estimado sem concessão de parcelamentos é de cerca de 30%, mas que aumenta em até quatro pontos percentuais diante da oferta de programas de refinanciamento de dívidas tributárias, como no caso do REFIS. Os efeitos sobre a espontaneidade são sempre negativos, e perduram por longo tempo, enquanto os contribuintes nutrirem expectativas sobre novos parcelamentos futuros. No lado das receitas, as simulações sugerem que a arrecadação na presença do parcelamento tributário é sempre inferior àquela que seria obtida se não houvesse parcelamento durante toda a etapa de concessão. Os ganhos de arrecadação posteriores, quando as parcelas são pagas, dependem da inadimplência e da expectativa de novos parcelamentos pelos contribuintes. Conclui-se que o mecanismo de parcelamentos tributários é inadequado como forma de aumentar as receitas e prover os incentivos corretos aos contribuintes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0101-41612014000200004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. CARNEIRO F. G., 1997, The Changing Informal Labour Market in Brazil: Cyclicality versus Excessive Intervention, LABOUR. Review of Labour Economics and Industrial Relations, 11, 01
  2. PAES N, 2011, O Hiato Tributário do Imposto sobre Produtos Industrializados - Evidências Setoriais, Revista Brasileira de Economia de Empresas, 11, 41
  3. PAES N, 2012, O Parcelamento Tributário e seus Efeitos sobre o Comportamento do Contribuinte, Revista Economia - ANPEC, 13, 345

Metadata

Authors
Paes, N. L.
Affiliations
UFPE, Brasil
Venue
Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo)
Published
2014-06
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
323-350
ISSN
0101-4161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015638432
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Taxation and Compliance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Keywords
tax revenue, tax arrears, Refis, taxpayer behavior, tax compliance, tax evasion, taxpayer expectations, tax delinquency, tax incentives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review