Cited by 109Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant ApplicationsEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesMedicinal Plant Research

Espécies vegetais indicadas na odontologia

Open access
Oliveira, Francielda Q., Gobira, Bárbara, Guimarães, Carolina, Batista, Jamylle, Barreto, Mariana, Souza, Mônica·2007·Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia

Abstract

Foi realizada uma revisão bibliográfica sobre plantas medicinais indicadas para afecções odontológicas, incluindo livros, artigos e sites científicos e populares. Os dados foram compilados em uma tabela contendo informações como nome científico, popular, família, parte utilizada e forma farmacêutica. Foram encontradas 132 espécies, distribuídas em 52 Famílias Botânicas citadas como úteis no tratamento de afecções odontológicas. As espécies mais citadas de acordo com a bibliografia consultada foram Punica granatum L. (10 citações), Althaea officinalis L.(8), Salvia officinalis L. (8), Calendula officinalis L.(8), Malva sylvestris L (7), Plantago major L. (6). O conjunto destes resultados deve permitir um perfil de espécies para uso em odontologia e contribuir para o direcionamento de pesquisas nesta área, culminando com o desenvolvimento de fitoterápicos de qualidade e validados para uso odontológico, bem como permitindo a divulgação destes estudos para a população e profissionais afins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0102-695x2007000300022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Falcão HS, Lima IO, Santos VL, Dantas HF, Diniz MFFM, Barbosa-Filho JM, Batista LM 2005. Review of the plants with anti-infl ammatory activity studied in Brazil. Rev Bras Farmacogn 15: 381-391.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliveira, F. Q., Gobira, B., Guimarães, C., Batista, J., Barreto, M., & Souza, M.
Affiliations
Centro Universitário Newton Paiva (BR)
Venue
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
Published
2007-09
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
466-476
ISSN
0102-695X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047065312
Cited by
109
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
13.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
medicinal plants, dental diseases, herbal medicine, Punica granatum, Althaea officinalis, Salvia officinalis, Calendula officinalis, Malva sylvestris, Plantago major, plant families

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review