Autoestima e motivação para aprender online: o caso de mulheres reclusas
Open accessAbstract
Resumo Partindo da ideia de que os recursos digitais podem facilitar aprendizagens e que a autoestima e a motivação para aprender constituem fatores disposicionais que as favorecem, o estudo caracteriza níveis de autoestima e de motivação de mulheres reclusas, a frequentar uma formação online, na sua relação com variáveis que lhes estão associadas. Os dados foram recolhidos por meio de escalas de avaliação da autoestima e da motivação para aprender, e por entrevistas. Os resultados apontam para a existência de níveis de autoestima superiores aos que foram identificados por outros estudos, para uma complementaridade entre motivações intrínseca e extrínseca e indicam correlações significativas entre algumas das variáveis associadas à situação das reclusas. Conclui-se que a aprendizagem online influenciou a autoestima dessas mulheres, assim como a motivação para aprender.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital education interventions are in line with Adult Education models, namely the student-centered flexible model, aiming to promote collaborative learning, an active role, autonomy, self-confidence and motivation among inmates.
“These digital education interventions are in line with the assumptions provided by Adult Education models (Knowles, 1984), namely the student's centered flexible model (Demiray, et al., 2016), aiming to promote, among inmates, collaborative learning, an active role in their apprenticeship and autonomy, in addition to self-confidence and motivation (Barros, Monteiro & Leite, 2022;Moreira, et al., 2”
From Learning with digital technologies in prison: a scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as Barros, Monteiro & Leite, 2022
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
The prison is another country: incarcerated students and (im)mobility in Australian prisons
Farley, H., & Hopkins, S. (2017) · Critical Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1255240 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
A Prisoners' Island: Teaching Australian Incarcerated Students in the Digital Age
Hopkins, S., & Farley, H. (2014) · Journal of Prison Education and Reentry · doi:10.15845/jper.v1i1.631 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning with digital technologies in prison: a scoping review
Barros, R., Monteiro, A., & Leite, C. (2023) · Digital Education Review · doi:10.1344/der.2023.43.1-17 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Barros, R., Monteiro, A., & Leite, C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Venue
- Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 116
- Pages
- 837-857
- ISSN
- 0104-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1809-4465
- OpenAlex
- W4282581491
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ensaio Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- self-esteem, student motivation, online learning, women prisoners, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, digital learning resources, prison education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
