Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 695

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fast food nation: the dark side of the all-American meal

Open access
Tapia Granados, José A.·2002·Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública

Abstract

El segundo proyecto, que abarcó seis estudios, se encaminó a investigar el efecto de un mejor nivel de salud sobre la productividad humana.El tercer proyecto se abocó al análisis de tres puntos: las inversiones en la salud, la iniquidad existente entre los niveles de población y la pobreza.Los tres proyectos, sometidos a discusión en octubre de 1999, se reflejan en las tres secciones que forman parte de la presente publicación.Las siguientes son las conclusiones más destacables del primer proyecto:

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1020-49892002000800019

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 695

Metadata

Authors
Tapia Granados, J. A.
Venue
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Published
2002-08
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
146-147
ISSN
1020-4989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049122546
Cited by
695
References
0
FWCI
81.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast food nation: the dark side of the all-American meal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/s1020-49892002000800019
The paper
Tapia Granados, J. A. (2002). Fast food nation: the dark side of the all-American meal. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1020-49892002000800019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.