Cited by 1,289Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorSensory Analysis and Statistical Methods

The Unhealthy = Tasty Intuition and Its Effects on Taste Inferences, Enjoyment, and Choice of Food Products

Raghunathan, Rajagopal, Naylor, Rebecca Walker, Hoyer, Wayne D.·2006·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

Across four experiments, the authors find that when information pertaining to the assessment of the healthiness of food items is provided, the less healthy the item is portrayed to be, (1) the better is its inferred taste, (2) the more it is enjoyed during actual consumption, and (3) the greater is the preference for it in choice tasks when a hedonic goal is more (versus less) salient. The authors obtain these effects both among consumers who report that they believe that healthiness and tastiness are negatively correlated and, to a lesser degree, among those who do not report such a belief. The authors also provide evidence that the association between the concepts of “unhealthy” and “tasty” operates at an implicit level. The authors discuss possibilities for controlling the effect of the unhealthy = tasty intuition (and its potential for causing negative health consequences), including controlling the volume of unhealthy but tasty food eaten, changing unhealthy foods to make them less unhealthy but still tasty, and providing consumers with better information about what constitutes “healthy.”

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jmkg.70.4.170

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raghunathan, R., Naylor, R. W., & Hoyer, W. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina
Corresponding author
  • Raghunathan, Rajagopal
  • Hoyer, Wayne D.
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
2006-10
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
170-184
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W1964363948
Cited by
1,289
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 50
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Keywords
food enjoyment, food choice, implicit associations, health information, consumer beliefs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review