Cited by 101Emotion and Mood RecognitionPsychological Testing and AssessmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Comparison of Brazilian and American norms for the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)

Open access
Ribeiro, Rafaela Larsen, Pompéia, Sabine, Bueno, Orlando Francisco Amodeo·2005·Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present article compares Brazilian and American norms for the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), a set of normative emotional photographic slides for experimental investigations. METHODS: Subjects were 1,062 Brazilian university students (364 men and 698 women) who rated 707 pictures from the IAPS in terms of pleasure, arousal, and dominance following the methodology of the original normative study in the US, enabling direct comparison of data from the two samples through Pearson product moment correlation and Student t test. RESULTS: All correlations were highly significant with the highest level for the pleasure dimension, followed by dominance and arousal. However, contrary to the American normative values, our data showed that Brazilian subjects generally assigned higher arousal ratings overall. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that this set of stimuli can be used in Brazil as an affective rating tool due to the high correlations found across the two populations, despite differences on the arousal dimension, which are discussed in detail.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1516-44462005000300009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ribeiro, R. L., Pompéia, S., & Bueno, O. F. A.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
Published
2005-09
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
208-215
ISSN
1516-4446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150732269
Cited by
101
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
International Affective Picture System, IAP, affective picture ratings, cross-cultural comparison, pleasure, arousal, dominance, emotional stimuli
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Arousal, Brazil, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Male, Terminology as Topic, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Sex Characteristics, United States, Linear Models, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review