The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality
Open accessAbstract
The present work evaluated the effect of different probiotics on carcass and meat quality of broilers. One thousand and fifty male Cobb chicks were distributed at one day of age in a randomized design with 3 x 2 + 1 factorial arrangement (3 probiotics, 2 levels of probiotics in drinking water and 1 negative control group), using 5 replications with 30 birds. Carcass yield was higher (p<0.05) in control birds. Nevertheless, the groups fed with probiotics showed higher (p<0.01) leg yield at 45 days of age. There was a significant decrease in color (lightness) and increase in pH of breast muscle 5 hours after slaughter in the probiotics treated birds. In the sensory analysis, meat flavor and general aspect 72 hours after slaughter were better when probiotics were added in both water and diet. There were no differences in water holding capacity, cooking loss and shearing force among different probiotics or between them and the control. Thus, meat quality was better when probiotics were fed in the water and diet instead of only in the diet. Nevertheless, carcass and meat quality showed no alteration when the control group was compared to birds fed with probiotics, except for leg yield improvement in the latter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shurson, G. C. (2018) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.11.010 · Cited by 341
Bai, K., Huang, Q., Zhang, J., He, J., Zhang, L., & Wang, T. (2017) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps/pew246 · Cited by 339
Probiotic yeasts in livestock sector
Vohra, A., Syal, P., & Madan, A. (2016) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.019 · Cited by 133
Zaghari, M., Zahroojian, N., Riahi, M., & Parhizkar, S. (2015) · Italian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4081/ijas.2015.3555 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Pelicano, E., Souza, P. D., Souza, H. D., Oba, A., Norkus, E., Kodawara, L., & Lima, T. D.
- Venue
- Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-214
- ISSN
- 1516-635X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088394293
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/s1516-635x2003000300009
- The paper
- Pelicano, E., Souza, P. D., Souza, H. D., Oba, A., Norkus, E., Kodawara, L., & Lima, T. D. (2003). Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-635x2003000300009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.