The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Building senses of "community": social memory, popular movements and political participation
Abstract
This lecture followed by a debate concerns popular movements, in particular those which the author describes as libertarian, emerging in the city of São Paulo in the late 1970s and early 80s. It focuses on the building of memory, its relevance in creating a sense of identity and of community, and the issue of political participation. The latter was one of the mottos during the democratization of relations between society and the State in Brazil, following the years of military rule, as well as being a major challenge to the creation and development of cultural policies in the country and, among them, those relating to cultural heritage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our study also recalled Ruth Cardoso's (2013) observation on twentieth century social movements in São Paulo: that social memory is fundamental for the creation of identity and community, and therefore to political participation.”
From Political polarization and the liberal bias: A plea for an anthropology of the popular (2026) · cites this paper as Cardoso 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Political polarization and the liberal bias: A plea for an anthropology of the popular
Mandache, L.-A. (2026) · Human Organization · doi:10.1080/00187259.2025.2561702 · Cited by 1
Juárez Rodríguez, B., & Calderón, B. L. (2024) · Cadernos do LEPAARQ (UFPEL) · doi:10.15210/lepaarq.v20i40.26098
Metadata
- Authors
- Cardoso, R.
- Venue
- Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 134-144
- ISSN
- 1809-4341
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
