The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
The population of Brazil, 1570-1700: a historiographical review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“It is also worth remembering that in 1590, there were about 280 Europeans in the Portuguese community in which the Sá lived (Carrara, 2014: 7), most of whom were men married to Indigenous women.”
From Archaeologies of gender, kinship, and mobility in Southeast Brazil: genealogies of Tupiniquim women and the itinerancy of ceramic practices (2023) · cites this paper as Carrara, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Sources: Rafael Chambouleyron, Portuguese colonization of the Amazon region, 1640-1706, Tese de doutorado, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2005, p. 65-68;
- Rafael Chambouleyron, "Escravos do Atlântico equatorial: tráfico negreiro para o Estado do Maranhão e Pará (século XVII e início do século XVIII)", Revista Brasileira de História, vol. 26, n. 52, 2006, p. 79-114. The referred sources are the following: for 1637:
- Bento Maciel Parente, "Relação do Estado do Maranhão: 4 de fevereiro de 1637", Anais da Biblioteca Nacional, vol. 26, 1904 (1905), p. 353-359 (total of "residents"); for the decade of 1660: Notícia do Estado… Biblioteca da Ajuda, códice 50-V-37, fl. 139-139v (total of "neighbors"; Cametá with "few"); for 1662: Maurício de Heriarte, "Descrição do Estado do Maranhão, Pará, Curupá e rio das Amazonas", In: Francisco Adolfo de Varnhagen, História Geral do Brasil, vol. 3, São Paulo, Melhoramentos, 1956, p. 211; 213; 217; 219; 221 (total of "residents" in São Luís and Curupi; for Belém, "neighbor residents"; Gurupá with "some" and Cametá with "few White residents"); for 1679: Simão e Sousa, Sobre o Maranhão e Pará e desordens dos ministros e oficiais que lá há, Biblioteca da Ajuda, Lisboa, 21 de outubro de 1679, códice 50-V-37, fls. 398-405, fl. 398 (total in "couples"); for 1684: João de Moura, a Portuguese colony that has three treaties: in the first, the State of Maranhão and its expansion has been described, 1684, Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal, Reservados, códice 585, fl. 13v (total of "neighbors" in São Luís and of "hearths" in Belém); for 1685: Manuel Guedes Aranha, "Papel político sobre o Estado do Maranhão" [c.1685], Revista do Instituto Histórico e Geográfico Brasileiro, 1ª parte, tomo 46 (1883), p. 4; 7; 12 (total of "neighbors" in São Luís and of "residents" in Belém); for 1693: João de Souza Ferreira, "América abreviada, suas notícias e de seus naturais, e em particular do Maranhão, títulos, contendas e instruções à sua conservação e aumento mui úteis" [1693], Revista do Instituto Histórico e Geográfico Brasileiro, 1ª parte, tomo 57 (1894), p. 33; 37; 43 (total of "neighbors" for São Luís and Alcântara and of "residents" for Belém). In addition to these, there are two conflicting estimates for the population of the State of Maranhão in 1688: one of 5,000 or 6,000 "residents", and another of 2,000 "residents": Papel sobre ... Sociedade de Geografia e Lisboa, Res. 2-B-6; and João de Sousa Ferreira, "Noticiário Maranhense" [1688?], Revista do Instituto Histórico e Geográfico Brasileiro, vol. 81, 1917, p. 289-352; 344. Notes: 1) The source from 1637 further adds to the total of residents 60 soldiers living in São Luís, 50 in Belém, 30 soldiers at the fort in Ceará (where four or five residents would also live) and at the fort of Gurupá, less than 30 soldiers with no residents; 2) to the total number of neighbors in São Luís in 1685, a total of 150 soldiers were added, and, in Belém, "200 men who can take up arms".
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noelli, F. S., Sallum, M., & Peixoto, S. A. (2023) · Journal of Social Archaeology · doi:10.1177/14696053231180273 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrara, A. A.
- Venue
- Tempo
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 1413-7704
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
