Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries: Review of Lessons and Experience

Coady, David, Grosh, Margaret, Hoddinott, John·2004·World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks

Abstract

No AccessRegional and Sectoral Studies1 Feb 2013Targeting of Transfers in Developing CountriesReview of Lessons and ExperienceAuthors/Editors: David Coady, Margaret Grosh, John HoddinottDavid Coady, Margaret Grosh, John Hoddinotthttps://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5769-7SectionsAboutPDF (1.2 MB) ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Abstract:Drawing on a database of more than one hundred anti-poverty interventions in 47 countries, Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries provides a general review of experiences with methods used to target interventions in transition and developing countries. Written for policymakers and program managers in developing countries, in donor agencies, and in NGOs who have responsibility for designing interventions that reach the poor, it conveys what targeting options are available, what results can be expected as well as information that will assist in choosing among them and in their implementation. Key messages are: While targeting "works" - the median program transfers 25 percent more to the poor than would a universal allocation - targeting performance around the world is highly variable. Means testing, geographic targeting, and self-selection based on a work requirement are the most robustly progressive methods. Proxy means testing, community-based selection of individuals and demographic targeting to children show good results on average, but with considerable variation. Demographic targeting to the elderly, community bidding, and self-selection based on consumption show limited potential for good targeting. There is no single preferred method for all types of programs or all country contexts. Successful targeting depends critically on how a method is implemented. Previous book FiguresReferencesRecommendedDetailsCited ByTargeting Social Transfers in Ethiopia's Agro‐pastoralist and Pastoralist SocietiesDevelopment and Change, Vol.53, No.212 November 2021Data, discretion and institutional capacity: Evidence from cash transfers in PakistanJournal of Public Economics, Vol.206Financial Resilience: A Way Forward Towards Economic Development in Developing CountriesSocial Indicators Research, Vol.160, No.15 September 2021Who Are Identified as Poor in Rural China's Targeted Poverty Alleviation Strategy? Applying the Multidimensional Capability ApproachJournal of Chinese Political Science, Vol.1027 January 2022Efficiency, Legitimacy, and Impacts of Targeting Methods: Evidence from an Experiment in NigerWorld Bank Economic Review, Vol.35, No.417 November 2021An Empirical Validation Method for Narrowing the Range of Poverty ThresholdsSocial Indicators Research, Vol.9516 October 2021Predicting poverty and malnutrition for targeting, mapping, monitoring, and early warningApplied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Vol.14815 July 2021Social Protection and State–Society Relations in Environments of Low and Uneven State CapacityAnnual Review of Political Science, Vol.24, No.1Assessing the performance of beneficiary targeting in Brazil's More Doctors ProgrammeHealth Policy and Planning, Vol.36, No.215 January 2021The Politics of Social Protection in Kenya: State Capacity, Political Competition and Social Pension Registration in Marsabit CountySSRN Electronic Journal, Vol.8Beyond Manipulation: Administrative Sorting in Regression Discontinuity DesignsJournal of Causal Inference, Vol.8, No.123 December 2020Motives behind community participation: Evidence from natural and artefactual field experiments in Sri LankaPacific Economic Review, Vol.25, No.521 December 2020Conditional Cash Transfers and Homogeneous Spaces: The Politics of Multiplicative EffectsLatin American Policy, Vol.11, No.25 November 2020Coverage of non-receipt of cash transfer (Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty) and associated factors among older persons in the Mampong Municipality, Ghana – a quantitative analysisBMC Geriatrics, Vol.20, No.115 October 2020Can Rationing Increase Welfare? Theory and an Application to India's Ration Shop SystemAmerican Economic Journal: Economic Policy, Vol.12, No.4Intake, Registration, and Assessment of Needs and Conditions3 December 2020Payments of Cash Benefits3 December 2020Eligibility and Enrollment3 December 2020Broad-based subsidies or targeted transfers? Distributional equity vs macroeconomic costsJournal of Economic Policy Reform13 July 2020Political favouritism and social conflict: a case study of the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) in PakistanArea Development and Policy, Vol.5, No.314 June 2019Targeting in Practice: A Review of Existing Mechanisms for Beneficiary Selection in the Democratic Republic of CongoJournal of International Development, Vol.32, No.524 March 2020Use of conditional cash transfers for addressing gender-based inequalities in health and education among children: studying the impact of the Shubh Laxmi scheme in Rajasthan, IndiaBehavioural Public Policy, Vol.629 June 2020Community-Based versus Statistical Targe

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1596/0-8213-5769-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Coady, D., Grosh, M., & Hoddinott, J.
Venue
World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks
Published
2004-08
OpenAlex
W4249548800
Cited by
336
References
2
FWCI
21.38
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries: Review of Lessons and Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/0-8213-5769-7
The paper
Coady, D., Grosh, M., & Hoddinott, J. (2004). Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries: Review of Lessons and Experience. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5769-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.