The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Governance Matters IV : Governance Indicators For 1996-2004
Open accessAbstract
Kaufmann, Kraay and Mastruzzi present the newly updated estimates of six dimensions of governance covering 209 countries and territories for five time periods: 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002 and 2004. These indicators are based on several hundred individual variables measuring perceptions of governance, drawn from 37 separate data sources constructed by 31 different organizations. The authors assign these individual measures of governance to categories capturing key dimensions of governance, and use an unobserved component model to construct six aggregate governance indicators in each of the four periods. They present the point estimates of the dimensions of governance as well as the margins of error for each country for the four periods. These margins of error are not unique to perceptions-based measures of governance, but are an important feature of all efforts to measure governance, including objective indicators. In fact, the authors provide examples of how individual objective measures provide an incomplete picture of even the quite particular dimensions of governance that they are intended to measure. The paper also analyzes in some detail changes over time in our estimates of governance; provide a framework for assessing the statistical significance of changes in governance; and suggest a simple rule of thumb for identifying statistically significant changes in country governance over time. The ability to identify significant changes in governance over time is much higher for our aggregate indicators than for any individual indicator. While they find that the quality of governance in a number of countries has changed significantly (in both directions), the authors also provide evidence suggesting that there are no trends, for better or worse, in global averages of governance. Finally, the authors interpret the strong observed correlation between income and governance, and argue against recent efforts to apply a discount to governance performance in low income countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1369 · Cited by 8,517
Cited by
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011) · Hague Journal on the Rule of Law · doi:10.1017/s1876404511200046 · Cited by 5,621
Self-citationThe resource curse revisited and revised: A tale of paradoxes and red herrings
Brunnschweiler, C. N., & Bulte, E. H. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.08.004 · Cited by 1,121
Globalization, Brain Drain, and Development
Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2012) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.50.3.681 · Cited by 1,083
Mandatory IFRS reporting and changes in enforcement
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2013) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.10.007 · Cited by 816
Cursing the Blessings? Natural Resource Abundance, Institutions, and Economic Growth
Brunnschweiler, C. N. (2008) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.004 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M.
- Venue
- World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks
- Publisher
- World Bank, Washington, DC
- Published
- 2005-06
- OpenAlex
- W1934649023
- Cited by
- 1,836
- References
- 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Governance Matters IV : Governance Indicators For 1996-2004. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/1813-9450-3630
- The paper
- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2005). Governance Matters IV : Governance Indicators For 1996-2004. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3630
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.