The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Protection and Jobs Responses to COVID-19: A Real-Time Review of Country Measures
Open accessAbstract
Some key finds from this "living paper" include : As of April 23, 2020, a total of 151 countries (18 more since last week) have planned, introduced or adapted 684 social protection measures in response to COVID-19 (Coronavirus). This is a ten-fold increase in measures since the first edition of this living paper (March 20). New countries include Angola, Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Belarus, Bermuda, Brunei, Chad, Grenada, Libya, Montserrat, Nigeria, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Seychelles, St Maarten, and UAE. Social assistance transfers are the most widely used class of interventions (60 percent of global responses, or 412 measures). These are complemented by significant action in social insurance and labor market-related measures (supply-side measures). Among safety nets, cash transfer programs remain the most widely used safety net intervention by governments (table 1 and figure 2). Overall, cash transfers include 222 COVID-related measures representing one-third (32.4 percent) of total COVID-related social protection programs. Cash transfers include a mix of both new and pre-existing programs of various duration and generosity. About half (47 percent) of cash transfers are new programs in 78 countries (reaching 512.6 million people), while one-fifth (22 percent) of measures are one-off payments. The average duration of transfers is 2.9 months. The size of transfers is relatively generous, or one-fifth (22 percent) of monthly GDP per capita in respective countries. On average, this is an increase of 86.6 percent compared to average pre-COVID transfer levels (where data is available for a subset of countries).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
COVID-19 risks to global food security
Laborde, D., Martin, W., Swinnen, J., & Vos, R. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abc4765 · Cited by 1,123
De Kock, J. H., Latham, H. A., Leslie, S. J., Grindle, M., Munoz, S.-A., Ellis, L., Polson, R., & O’Malley, C. M. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-10070-3 · Cited by 940
Estimates of the impact of COVID-19 on global poverty
Sumner, A., Hoy, C., & Ortiz-Juarez, E. (2020) · WIDER Working Paper · doi:10.35188/unu-wider/2020/800-9 · Cited by 783
World Development Report 2022: Finance for an Equitable Recovery
Bank, W. (2022) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1730-4 · Cited by 396
Indonesia in the Time of Covid-19
Olivia, S., Gibson, J., & Nasrudin, R. (2020) · Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies · doi:10.1080/00074918.2020.1798581 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Almenfi, M., Gentilini, U., Orton, I., & Dale, P.
- Venue
- World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks
- Publisher
- World Bank, Washington, DC
- Published
- 2020-04-17
- OpenAlex
- W3020705411
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 131.15
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Protection and Jobs Responses to COVID-19: A Real-Time Review of Country Measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/33635
- The paper
- Almenfi, M., Gentilini, U., Orton, I., & Dale, P. (2020). Social Protection and Jobs Responses to COVID-19: A Real-Time Review of Country Measures. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1596/33635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.