The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1): Essential Surgery
Open accessAbstract
Essential Surgery is the first volume in the Disease Control Priorities, third edition (DCP3) series. DCP3 endeavors to inform program design and resource allocation at the global and country levels by providing a comprehensive review of the effectiveness, cost, and cost-effectiveness of priority health interventions. The volume presents data on the surgical burden of disease, disability, congenital anomalies, and trauma, along with health impact and economic analyses of procedures, platforms, and packages to improve care in settings with severe budget limitations. Essential Surgery identifies 44 surgical procedures that meet the following criteria: they address substantial needs, are cost effective, and are feasible to implement in low- and middle-income countries. If made universally available, the provision of these 44 procedures would avert 1.5 million deaths a year and rank among the most cost effective of all health interventions. Existing health care delivery structures can be leveraged to provide affordable and quality care, with first-level hospitals capable of delivering the majority of procedures, while addressing substantial disparities in safety. Existing infrastructure can also expand access to surgery by implementing measures such as task sharing, which has been shown to be safe and effective while countries build workforce capacity. Nearly ten years after the second iteration of Disease Control Priorities was released, increased attention to the importance of health systems in providing access to quality care is once again reshaping the global health landscape. Low- and middle-income countries are continuing to set priorities for funding and are making decisions across an increasingly complex set of policy and intervention choices with a greater appreciation for the value of program and economic evaluations. By reviewing the large burden of surgical disorders, the cost-effectiveness of surgical procedures, and the strong public demand for surgical services, Essential Surgery makes a compelling case for improving global access to surgical care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Planning for tomorrow: global cancer incidence and the role of prevention 2020–2070
Soerjomataram, I., & Bray, F. (2021) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00514-z · Cited by 1,012
Dewan, M. C., Rattani, A., Fieggen, G., Arraez, M. A., Servadei, F., Boop, F. A., Johnson, W. D., Warf, B. C., & Park, K. B. (2019) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2017.11.jns171500 · Cited by 640
Truché, P., Shoman, H., Reddy, C. L., Jumbam, D. T., Ashby, J., Mazhiqi, A., Wurdeman, T., Ameh, E. A., Smith, M., Lugazia, E., et al. (2020) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-019-0531-5 · Cited by 330
Prioritisation of surgery in the National health strategic plans of Africa: a systematic review
Citron, I., Chokotho, L., & Lavy, C. (2016) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-015-3333-9 · Cited by 47
Zhang, F., Wang, H., Liu, L., Su, T., & Ji, B. (2023) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-023-08602-4 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Venue
- World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks
- Publisher
- The World Bank
- Published
- 2015-03-23
- OpenAlex
- W211945194
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.37
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1): Essential Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/978-1-4648-0346-8
- The paper
- Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1): Essential Surgery. (2015). World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0346-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.