The New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension: Expanding the Literacy and Learning Curriculum
Abstract
This commentary explores a central issue for our times, online reading comprehension. It first defines three issues that have largely gone unnoticed as the Internet enters our classrooms: 1) literacy has become deictic; 2) effective online information use requires additional online reading comprehension practices, skills, and dispositions; and 3) misalignments in public policy, assessment, and instruction impede our ability to prepare students for the effective use of online information and communication. It analyzes the Common Core State Standards for Reading and Writing in the U. S. and the Australian National Curriculum in relation to elements of online reading comprehension. It argues that continued misalignments especially jeopardize opportunities for those students in districts that are economically challenged.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Online reading encompasses communication and social functions and allows social and collaborative reading.
“Furthermore, online reading also encompasses communication and social functions (e-mails, instant messaging, social media) and allows social and collaborative reading (Leu et al., 2011).”
From Do New Forms of Reading Pay Off? A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Leisure Digital Reading Habits and Text Comprehension (2025) · cites this paper as Leu et al., 2011
Cites
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251 · see citing works
Rouet, J.-F. (2006) · doi:10.4324/9780203820094 · Cited by 337 · cited 6× · see citing works
“sources ( Jenkins, 2006; Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Altamura, L., Vargas, C., & Salmerón, L. (2025) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231216463 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Nobody spoke like I did: Picture books, critical literacy, and global contexts
Callow, J. (2017) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1002/trtr.1626 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leu, D. J., Gregory McVerry, J., Ian O'Byrne, W., Kiili, C., Zawilinski, L., Everett‐Cacopardo, H., Kennedy, C., & Forzani, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-14
- ISSN
- 1081-3004 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-2706
- OpenAlex
- W1936041674
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 236.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- online reading comprehension, new literacies, digital literacy, literacy curriculum, Common Core State Standards, Australian Curriculum, online information use, assessment policy, educational equity, low-income students, internet use in schools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review