The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fluency: Bridge Between Decoding and Reading Comprehension
Abstract
A deep, developmental construct and definition of fluency, in which fluency and reading comprehension have a reciprocal relationship, is explicated and contrasted with superficial approaches to that construct. The historical development of fluency is outlined, along with conclusions of the U.S. National Reading Panel, to explore why fluency has moved from being “the neglected aspect of reading” to a popular topic in the field. A practical, developmental instructional program based largely on the theoretical framework and research findings of Linnea Ehri is delineated. The nine essential components of that program include building the graphophonic foundations for fluency; building and extending vocabulary and oral language skills; providing expert instruction and practice in the recognition of high-frequency vocabulary; teaching common word parts and spelling patterns; teaching, modeling, and providing practice in the application of a decoding strategy; using appropriate texts to coach strategic behaviors and to build reading speed; using repeated reading procedures as an intervention approach for struggling readers; extending growing fluency through wide independent reading; and monitoring fluency development through appropriate assessment procedures. The position is taken throughout that teaching, developing, and assessing fluency must always be done in the context of reading comprehension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills
(2018) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n214 · Cited by 1,051
The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.411 · Cited by 510
Reading fluency: Implications for the assessment of children with reading disabilities
Meisinger, E. B., Bloom, J. S., & Hynd, G. W. (2010) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/s11881-009-0031-z · Cited by 82
Kofler, M. J., Spiegel, J. A., Soto, E. F., Irwin, L. N., Wells, E. L., & Austin, K. E. (2019) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-018-0447-1 · Cited by 57
Seoul Eonnam Elementary School, S. K., Kim, J. M., & Alex, H.-C. L. (2021) · The Journal of AsiaTEFL · doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.3.7.858 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J.
- Venue
- The Reading Teacher
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 510-519
- ISSN
- 0034-0561 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079117140
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluency: Bridge Between Decoding and Reading Comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1598/rt.58.6.2
- The paper
- Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge Between Decoding and Reading Comprehension. The Reading Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.58.6.2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.