Cited by 510

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading

Duke, Nell K., Cartwright, Kelly B.·2021·Reading Research Quarterly

Abstract

The simple view of reading is commonly presented to educators in professional development about the science of reading. The simple view is a useful tool for conveying the undeniable importance—in fact, the necessity—of both decoding and linguistic comprehension for reading. Research in the 35 years since the theory was proposed has revealed additional understandings about reading. In this article, we synthesize research documenting three of these advances: (1) Reading difficulties have a number of causes, not all of which fall under decoding and/or listening comprehension as posited in the simple view; (2) rather than influencing reading solely independently, as conceived in the simple view, decoding and listening comprehension (or in terms more commonly used in reference to the simple view today, word recognition and language comprehension) overlap in important ways; and (3) there are many contributors to reading not named in the simple view, such as active, self‐regulatory processes, that play a substantial role in reading. We point to research showing that instruction aligned with these advances can improve students’ reading. We present a theory, which we call the active view of reading, that is an expansion of the simple view and can be used to convey these important advances to current and future educators. We discuss the need to lift up updated theories and models to guide practitioners’ work in supporting students’ reading development in classrooms and interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rrq.411

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Varying Degrees of Variance Shared Between Word Recognition (WR) and Language Comprehension (LC) in Reading (R)
Varying Degrees of Variance Shared Between Word Recognition (WR) and Language Comprehension (LC) in Reading (R)CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
FIGURE 2 The Active View of Reading Model
FIGURE 2 The Active View of Reading ModelCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Note . From 'Connecting Early Language and Literacy to Later Reading (Dis)abilities: Evidence, Theory, and Practice,' by H.S. Scarborough, 2001, in S.B. Neuman and D.K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of Early Literacy Research (Vol. 1, p. 98), New York, NY: Guilford. Copyright 2001 by The Guilford Press. Reprinted with permission.
Note . From 'Connecting Early Language and Literacy to Later Reading (Dis)abilities: Evidence, Theory, and Practice,' by H.S. Scarborough, 2001, in S.B. Neuman and D.K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of Early Literacy Research (Vol. 1, p. 98), New York, NY: Guilford. Copyright 2001 by The Guilford Press. Reprinted with permission.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Douglas Fisher
Douglas FisherCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Brian Cambourne
Brian CambourneCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Debra Crouch
Debra CrouchCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Gholdy Muhammad
Gholdy MuhammadCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Susan B. Neuman
Susan B. NeumanCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Lisa Forehand
Lisa ForehandCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Nancy Frey
Nancy FreyCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Stephen G. Peters
Stephen G. PetersCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Rachael Gabriel
Rachael GabrielCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Dan Santat
Dan SantatCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 18
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 19
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
A.S. King
A.S. KingCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Jasmyn Wright
Jasmyn WrightCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Yong Zhao
Yong ZhaoCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 132

  1. 10.1177/002221949903200203 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/0022219407310838 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/desc.12422 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.009 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z · DOI
  6. 10.1598/RT.61.5.1 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.002 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/00957984980244004 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/0741932509355988 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s11145-015-9608-6 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s10648-017-9422-6 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.488 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/rrq.338 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.56 · DOI
  15. Cartwright K.B., 2015, Executive skills and reading comprehension: A guide for educators
  16. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100932 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.01.003 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/trtr.1818 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/rrq.273 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/0741932518767563 · DOI
  21. 10.4324/9781410612052 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/002221940303600208 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/rrq.343 · DOI
  24. 10.1023/A:1011114724881 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s11145-008-9126-x · DOI
  26. 10.1207/s15326950dp3902&3_9 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311 · DOI
  28. 10.1037/a0019452 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90079-N · DOI
  30. Cutting L.E., 2015, Advances in reading intervention: Research to practice to research, 73
  31. 10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5 · DOI
  32. Cutting L.E., 2012, Reaching an understanding: Innovations in how we view reading assessment, 101
  33. Dawson P., 2018, Executive skills in children and adolescents
  34. 10.1007/s10648-018-9443-9 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1080/14739879.2018.1450096 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/trtr.1819 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.07.002 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/10888438.2013.819356 · DOI
  39. 10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2 · DOI
  40. 10.1037/edu0000180 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295 · DOI
  42. Foorman B.R., 2018, Decomposing the variance in reading comprehension to reveal the unique and common effects of language and decoding, JoVE Journal, 140
  43. 10.1080/19345747.2016.1237597 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s11145-020-10043-3 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/0741932518772904 · DOI
  46. 10.3102/0034654313499616 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/1467-9817.12091 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/0022219408326210 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/mbe.12125 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x · DOI
  51. 10.1080/10888438.2012.689791 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1007/s11145-017-9736-2 · DOI
  53. Gough P.B., 1996, Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention, 1
  54. 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.004 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/rrq.81 · DOI
  56. 10.1037/edu0000082 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100323 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/1467-9817.12246 · DOI
  59. 10.2307/25474660 · DOI
  60. Hoffman J.H., 2009, Handbook of research on reading comprehension, 54
  61. 10.3109/17549507.2014.904441 · DOI
  62. 10.1177/0741932518773154 · DOI
  63. 10.1007/978-3-030-44195-1 · DOI
  64. Houck B.D., 2012, Dismantling the myth of learning to read and reading to learn, ASCD Express, 7
  65. Huey E.B., 1908, The psychology and pedagogy of reading
  66. 10.1086/709857 · DOI
  67. International Dyslexia Association, 2018, Scarborough’s reading rope: A groundbreaking infographic, The Examiner, 7
  68. 10.1111/desc.12866 · DOI
  69. 10.1007/978-3-030-26550-2_1 · DOI
  70. 10.1080/02702710050084428 · DOI
  71. 10.1037/edu0000316 · DOI
  72. 10.1348/978185408X369020 · DOI
  73. 10.1007/s11145-010-9278-3 · DOI
  74. 10.1002/rrq.54 · DOI
  75. 10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5 · DOI
  77. 10.1111/1467-9817.12251 · DOI
  78. 10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4 · DOI
  79. 10.1207/s15548430jlr3804_1 · DOI
  80. 10.1002/rrq.99 · DOI
  81. 10.1007/s11145-018-9840-y · DOI
  82. 10.1037/edu0000459 · DOI
  83. 10.1177/0741932518764833 · DOI
  84. 10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.263 · DOI
  85. Lysaker J.T., 2011, Reading and social imagination: What relationally oriented reading instruction can do for children, Reading Psychology, 32, 520
  86. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.205 · DOI
  87. 10.1177/0022219413504996 · DOI
  88. 10.1007/s10648-020-09584-4 · DOI
  89. 10.1007/s11881-013-0080-1 · DOI
  90. Moats L., 2018, Develop your teachers into literacy experts
  91. 10.1080/10573569.2016.1203272 · DOI
  92. 10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763 · DOI
  93. 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00132.x · DOI
  94. 10.1080/19404158.2019.1609272 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00238.x · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1111/bjep.12355 · DOI
  97. Nusca V., 1999, The role of domain‐specific knowledge in the reading comprehension of adult readers
  98. 10.1007/s10648-018-9445-7 · DOI
  99. 10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1 · DOI
  100. 10.1080/10888438.2013.827687 · DOI · Paper page
  101. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01754.x · DOI
  102. 10.1598/RT.58.6.2 · DOI
  103. 10.1177/0022219415613080 · DOI
  104. Pressley M., 1995, Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading
  105. 10.2307/747692 · DOI
  106. 10.3102/01623737024003219 · DOI
  107. Rose J., 2006, Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Final report
  108. Rose J., 2017, Teaching reading—it’s simple but not simplistic, Teacher
  109. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00441.x · DOI
  110. Scarborough H.S., 2001, Handbook of early literacy research, 97
  111. 10.1007/s11145-016-9667-3 · DOI
  112. 10.1002/rrq.341 · DOI
  113. 10.1080/09297040802220029 · DOI
  114. Shanahan T., 2010, Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade: A practice guide
  115. 10.3102/00028312025003441 · DOI
  116. 10.1080/10888438.2011.618153 · DOI
  117. 10.1177/0741932518770288 · DOI
  118. 10.1080/10888438.2016.1178267 · DOI
  119. 10.1177/0022219416638028 · DOI
  120. 10.1002/rrq.385 · DOI
  121. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101848 · DOI
  122. 10.1007/s11145-020-10034-4 · DOI
  123. 10.1080/10888438.2018.1450410 · DOI
  124. 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01401.x · DOI
  125. 10.1037/a0023495 · DOI
  126. 10.1177/0022219411432685 · DOI
  127. 10.1002/acp.1414 · DOI
  128. 10.2307/747435 · DOI
  129. 10.1016/j.dr.2020.100945 · DOI
  130. 10.1002/rrq.163 · DOI
  131. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.10.027 · DOI
  132. 10.1002/rrq.287 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B.
Venue
Reading Research Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05
Volume
56
Issue
S1
ISSN
  • 0034-0553
  • 1936-2722
Cited by
510
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rrq.411
The paper
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411