Cited by 123Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline and Blended Learning

“Learning latent engagement patterns of students in online courses,”

Open access
Ramesh, Arti, Goldwasser, Dan, Huang, Bert, Daume III, Hal, Getoor, Lise·2014·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Maintaining and cultivating student engagement is critical for learning. Understanding factors affecting student engagement will help in designing better courses and improving student retention. The large number of participants in massive open online courses (MOOCs) and data collected from their interaction with the MOOC open up avenues for studying student engagement at scale. In this work, we develop a framework for modeling and understanding student engagement in online courses based on student behavioral cues. Our first contribution is the abstraction of student engagement types using latent representations and using that in a probabilistic model to connect student behavior with course completion. We demonstrate that the latent formulation for engagement helps in predicting student survival across three MOOCs. Next, in order to initiate better instructor interventions, we need to be able to predict student survival early in the course. We demonstrate that we can predict student survival early in the course reliably using the latent model. Finally, we perform a closer quantitative analysis of user interaction with the MOOC and identify student activities that are good indicators for survival at different points in the course.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8920

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers have explored features such as students' prior experiences, motivation and home environment, and student engagement with the course for attrition prediction.

    “To this end, researchers have explored features such as students' prior experiences, motivation and home environment (DeBoer et al., 2013) and student engagement with the course (Aguiar et al., 2014; Ramesh et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yang, D.; Sinha, T.; Adamson, D.; and Penstein, R. 2013. Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. In NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramesh, A., Goldwasser, D., Huang, B., Daume III, H., & Getoor, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2014-06-21
Volume
28
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2131148439
Cited by
123
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5
FWCI
8.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0937094, 0746930)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
student engagement, online courses, massive open online courses, course completion, instructor intervention, user interaction analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review