The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explainable Agency for Intelligent Autonomous Systems
Open accessAbstract
As intelligent agents become more autonomous, sophisti- cated, and prevalent, it becomes increasingly important that humans interact with them effectively. Machine learning is now used regularly to acquire expertise, but common techniques produce opaque content whose behavior is difficult to interpret. Before they will be trusted by humans, autonomous agents must be able to explain their decisions and the reasoning that produced their choices. We will refer to this general ability as explainable agency. This capacity for explaining decisions is not an academic exercise. When a self-driving vehicle takes an unfamiliar turn, its passenger may desire to know its reasons. When a synthetic ally in a computer game blocks a player’s path, he may want to understand its purpose. When an autonomous military robot has abandoned a high-priority goal to pursue another one, its commander may request justification. As robots, vehicles, and synthetic characters become more selfreliant, people will require that they explain their behaviors on demand. The more impressive these agents’ abilities, the more essential that we be able to understand them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“some contributions [50, 59] include the ability of a model to be interactive with the user as one of the goals targeted by an explainable ML model.”
From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI (2020) · cites this paper as [59]
Citations
Cites
Axten, N., Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063712 · Cited by 6,886
Building Watson: An Overview of the DeepQA Project
Ferrucci, D. A., Brown, E. W., Chu‐Carroll, J., Fan, J., Gondek, D. C., Kalyanpur, A. A., Lally, A., Murdock, J. W., Nyberg, E., Prager, J. M., et al. (2010) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v31i3.2303 · Cited by 1,523
Explanation in Second Generation Expert Systems
Swartout, W. R., & Moore, J. D. (1993) · Second Generation Expert Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-77927-5_24 · Cited by 160
Agents that Learn to Explain Themselves
Johnson, W. L. (1994) · Cited by 93
Plan Explainability and Predictability for Cobots.Preprint
Zhang, Y., Zhuo, H. H., & Subbarao Kambhampati, B. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–155 of 155
Kridalukmana, R., Lu, H., & Naderpour, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2022.3202900 · Cited by 6
Investigating Car Drivers’ Information Demand after Safety and Security Critical Incidents
Gröber, L., Fassl, M., Gupta, A., & Krombholz, K. (2021) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3446862 · Cited by 5
An Argumentation-Based Approach for Explaining Goals Selection in Intelligent Agents
Morveli-Espinoza, M., Tacla, C. A., & Jasinski, H. M. R. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61380-8_4 · Cited by 5
Fernández-Becerra, L., González-Santamarta, M. Á., Guerrero‐Higueras, Á. M., Rodríguez-Lera, F. J., & Olivera, V. M. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4773675 · Cited by 9
Developing Autopilot Agent Transparency for Collaborative Driving
Kridalukmana, R., Eridani, D., Septiana, R., Rochim, A. F., & Setyobudhi, C. T. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/jcsse54890.2022.9836249 · Cited by 4
Explainable Data Fusion on Edge: Challenges and Opportunities
Sinha, S., & Vashisht, P. (2022) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18292-1_8 · Cited by 4
User Interfaces and Scheduling and Planning: Workshop Summary and Proposed Challenges.
Freedman, R. G., Chakraborti, T., Talamadupula, K., Magazzeni, D., & Frank, J. (2018) · Research Portal (King's College London) · Cited by 4
Extracting Reasons for Moral Judgments Under Various Ethical Principles
Lindner, F., & Möllney, K. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30179-8_18 · Cited by 5
Axiom Learning and Belief Tracing for Transparent Decision Making in RoboticsPreprint
Mota, T., & Sridharan, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.10645 · Cited by 4
Self-citationRoad scene map for autonomous driving and modeling method
Lei, J., You, X., Tian, J., Yang, J., Gao, K., & Liu, W. (2025) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2025.2505623 · Cited by 3
Verhagen, R., Neerincx, M. A., & Tielman, M. L. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732157 · Cited by 3
Fernández-Becerra, L., Guerrero-Higueras, Á., Rodríguez-Lera, F. J., & Olivera, V. M. (2026) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2026.132631 · Cited by 3
Bernardini, S., Fagnani, F., Neacsu, A., & Franco, S. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104148 · Cited by 3
Explainable Agency by Revealing Suboptimality in Child-Robot Learning Scenarios
Tulli, S., Couto, M., Vasco, M., Yadollahi, E., Melo, F. S., & Paiva, A. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_3 · Cited by 3
Explainable Goal Recognition: A Framework Based on Weight of Evidence
Alshehri, A. S., Miller, T., & Vered, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling · doi:10.1609/icaps.v33i1.27173 · Cited by 3
Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup as an Evaluation Domain for Artificial IntelligencePreprint
Dannenhauer, D., Floyd, M. W., Decker, J. W., & Aha, D. W. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.01769 · Cited by 3
Progressive Explanation Generation for Human-robot TeamingPreprint
Zhang, Y., & Zakershahrak, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.00604 · Cited by 3
Towards Explainable and Trustworthy Autonomous Physical Systems
Omeiza, D., Anjomshoae, S., Kollnig, K., Camburu, O.-M., Främling, K., & Kunze, L. (2021) · Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411763.3441338 · Cited by 2
Fully Embedded Learning in BDI Agents Programmed in ASTRA
Beaumont, K., & Collier, R. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01082-7_10 · Cited by 2
Preference Elicitation and Explanation in Iterative Planning
Sanneman, L. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/917 · Cited by 2
Toward a Cognitive Control Framework for Explainable Robotics
Caccavale, R., & Finzi, A. (2021) · Springer proceedings in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71356-0_4 · Cited by 2
Towards a Holistic Framework for Explainable Robot Navigation
Halilovic, A., & Krivić, S. (2024) · Springer proceedings in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55000-3_15 · Cited by 2
Björnsson, Y. (2024) · ICGA Journal · doi:10.3233/icg-240256 · Cited by 2
Back to the Future of Integrated Robot Systems
Sridharan, M. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i27.35085 · Cited by 2
Self-citationFukuchi, Y., Osawa, M., Yamakawa, H., & Imai, M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3176104 · Cited by 2
BEE: Belief-Value-Aligned, Explainable, and Extensible Cognitive Framework for Conversational Agents
Yang, C., Groß, M. H., & Wampfler, R. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3717511.3747067 · Cited by 1
Engineering Inter-agent Explainability in BDI Agents
Beaumont, K., Yan, E., Burattini, S., & Collier, R. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01399-6_9 · Cited by 1
The Role of Accounts and Apologies in Mitigating Blame toward Human and Machine Agents
Stowers, K. L. (2017) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · Cited by 1
A Network Flow Interpretation of Robust Goal Legibility in Path Finding
Bernardini, S., Fagnani, F., Franco, S., & Neacsu, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling · doi:10.1609/icaps.v32i1.19856 · Cited by 1
Grounding Robot Navigation in Self-Defense Law
Zhu, J., Shrivastava, A., & Johnson, A. M. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309428 · Cited by 1
Development and Evaluation of Exploratory Experiences to Facilitate Reasoning About Robotic Systems
Balali, S., Hudspeth, M., Afflerbach, I., Helgesen, H., McCurry, J., Al-Afia, W. A., Bruslind, K., Hays, K., Sowell, R. T., West, R. G., et al. (2023) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros55552.2023.10342409 · Cited by 1
An Education Model of Reasonable and Good-Faith Effort for Autonomous Systems
Grimm, C. M., Smart, W. D., & Hartzog, W. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278732 · Cited by 1
Explanation of Reinforcement Learning Model in Dynamic Multi-Agent SystemPreprint
Wang, X., Li, H., Zhang, H., Lewis, M. A., & Sycara, K. P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.01508 · Cited by 6
An Argumentation-based Approach for Explaining Goal Selection in Intelligent AgentsPreprint
Morveli-Espinoza, M., Tacla, C. A., & Jasinski, H. M. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.06131 · Cited by 1
Explaining Possible Futures for Robust Autonomous Decision-Making.
Gilpin, L. H. (2019) · National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
A Unifying Bayesian Formulation of Measures of Interpretability in Human-AIPreprint
Sreedharan, S., Kulkarni, A., Smith, D. E., & Subbarao Kambhampati, B. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.10743
An Approach to Modeling Simulated Military Human-agent Teaming
Hidalgo, M. (2020) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Towards Explainable Practical Agency
Ehab, N., & Ismail, H. O. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82017-6_16
Mensch-Maschine-Zusammenarbeit bei der Entscheidungsfindung
Hatz, A., Jaklič, J., & Morelli, F. (2022) · Anwendungen und Konzepte der Wirtschaftsinformatik · doi:10.26034/lu.akwi.2022.3338
Exploring Trust and Explainability of Unmanned Systems
Field, J. R. (2023) · MTS/IEEE OCEANS Conference (OCEANS) · doi:10.1109/oceanslimerick52467.2023.10244349
Erklärbare Künstliche Intelligenz im Kontext von Bildung und Lernen
Weitz, K. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40079-8_20
Morandín-Ahuerma, F. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2565393 · Cited by 1
Pansoni, S., Beck, E., & Tiribelli, S. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01399-6_11
Towards Explainable BDI Agents for End Users
Mauri, M., & Minor, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18011-7_13
Toward interpretable machine learning, with applications to large-scale industrial systems data
Mita, G. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/acfd6da1z8046z49d6z8c4ez2da37571763c
A Neural-Symbolic learning framework to produce interpretable predictions for image classification
Bennetot, A. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2b59f598z2028z49afz8a20z29b21f19f394
Collaborate and explain on-the-fly: knowledge-based reasoning and learning in ad hoc teamwork
Dodampegama, H., & Sridharan, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1765191
Self-citationExplainable AI for HCI: a systematic review of a decade of studies on XAI tools
Alaqsam, A., & Sas, C. (2026) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwag022
Evaluating Actionability in Explainable AI
Mansi, G., Kim, J., & Riedl, M. O. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30849-8_5 · Cited by 1
Explainable Action Chains in Agentic AI: Enhancing Transparency and Trust
Selimi, A., Ali, İ., & Cafer, C. (2026) · Journal of AI · doi:10.61969/jai.1955038
Agent Toolkits: Explainable Agency in ASTRA
Beaumont, K., Yan, E., Burattini, S., & Collier, R. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22817-8_5
Explanation Needs Emerge Before Explicit Requests in Human-Robot Interaction
Kontogiorgos, D., Gustafson, J., & Shah, J. (2026) · INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION · doi:10.1145/3776574.3831198
Miller, T., Howe, P., & Sonenberg, L. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.00547 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Langley, P., Meadows, B., Sridharan, M., & Choi, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2017-02-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 4762-4763
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2604602969
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- explainable AI, autonomous agents, decision explanation, human-robot interaction, trust in autonomous systems, autonomous vehicles, model interpretability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review