The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anomaly Detection Using Autoencoders in High Performance Computing Systems
Open accessAbstract
Anomaly detection in supercomputers is a very difficult problem due to the big scale of the systems and the high number of components. The current state of the art for automated anomaly detection employs Machine Learning methods or statistical regression models in a supervised fashion, meaning that the detection tool is trained to distinguish among a fixed set of behaviour classes (healthy and unhealthy states).We propose a novel approach for anomaly detection in HighPerformance Computing systems based on a Machine (Deep) Learning technique, namely a type of neural network called autoencoder. The key idea is to train a set of autoencoders to learn the normal (healthy) behaviour of the supercomputer nodes and, after training, use them to identify abnormal conditions. This is different from previous approaches which where based on learning the abnormal condition, for which there are much smaller datasets (since it is very hard to identify them to begin with).We test our approach on a real supercomputer equipped with a fine-grained, scalable monitoring infrastructure that can provide large amount of data to characterize the system behaviour. The results are extremely promising: after the training phase to learn the normal system behaviour, our method is capable of detecting anomalies that have never been seen before with a very good accuracy (values ranging between 88% and 96%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Lee, K. B., Cheon, S., & Kim, C. O. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing · doi:10.1109/tsm.2017.2676245 · Cited by 483
Cited by
Progress in Outlier Detection Techniques: A Survey
Wang, H., Bah, M. J., & Hammad, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2932769 · Cited by 523
OC-FakeDect: Classifying Deepfakes Using One-class Variational Autoencoder
Khalid, H., & Woo, S. S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00336 · Cited by 197
Counterfactual Explanations for Multivariate Time Series
Ates, E., Aksar, B., Leung, V. J., & Coskun, A. K. (2021) · 2021 International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence (ICAPAI) · doi:10.1109/icapai49758.2021.9462056 · Cited by 88
Free-riders in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses
Lin, J., Du, M., & Liu, J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.12560 · Cited by 76
Adversarial Autoencoder for Unsupervised Time Series Anomaly Detection and Interpretation
Chen, X., Deng, L., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, K. (2023) · Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3539597.3570371 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Borghesi, A., Bartolini, A., Lombardi, M., Milano, M., & Benini, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2019-07-17
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 9428-9433
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2901773810
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anomaly Detection Using Autoencoders in High Performance Computing Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019428
- The paper
- Borghesi, A., Bartolini, A., Lombardi, M., Milano, M., & Benini, L. (2019). Anomaly Detection Using Autoencoders in High Performance Computing Systems. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019428
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.