Cited by 91Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Software Testing and Debugging TechniquesTime Series Analysis and Forecasting

Counterfactual Explanations for Multivariate Time Series

Open access
Ates, Emre, Aksar, Burak, Leung, Vitus J., Coskun, Ayse K.·2021·2021 International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence (ICAPAI)

Abstract

Multivariate time series are used in many science and engineering domains, including health-care, astronomy, and high-performance computing. A recent trend is to use machine learning (ML) to process this complex data and these ML-based frameworks are starting to play a critical role for a variety of applications. However, barriers such as user distrust or difficulty of debugging need to be overcome to enable widespread adoption of such frameworks in production systems. To address this challenge, we propose a novel explainability technique,CoMTE, that providescounterfactualexplanationsforsupervisedmachinelearningframeworksonmultivariatetimeseriesdata. Using various machine learning frameworks and data sets, we compare CoMTE with several state-of-the-art explainability methods and show that we outperform existing methods in comprehensibility and robustness. We also show how CoMTE can be used to debug machine learning frameworks and gain a better understanding of the underlying multivariate time series data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icapai49758.2021.9462056

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various techniques have been proposed to analyze longitudinal data with XAI, but most have not yet been extensively applied to real-world clinical questions.

    “Similarly, various techniques have been proposed to analyze longitudinal data with XAI57,87–90, but most have not yet been extensively applied to real-world clinical questions.”

    From Orchestrating explainable artificial intelligence for multimodal and longitudinal data in medical imaging (2024) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Introduction (p. 2) proposes a counterfactual explanation method for multivariate time-series data, supporting this paper as an example of a proposed XAI technique. The Data Sets section (p. 6) describes HPC telemetry and motion-classification data, not clinical applications. The paper does not establish the broader claim that most such techniques have not been extensively applied to real-world clinical questions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [5][5] E. Ates, Y. Zhang, B. Aksar, J. Brandt, V. J. Leung, M. Egele, and A. K. Coskun, 'HPAS: An HPC performance anomaly suite for reproducing performance variations,' in Proceedings of the 48th International Conference on Parallel Processing , ser. ICPP 2019, no. 40, 2019. -
  2. [11][11] J. Klinkenberg, C. Terboven, S. Lankes, and M. S. M¨ uller, 'Data miningbased analysis of HPC center operations,' in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER) , 2017, pp. 766-773. -
  3. [25][25] S. Wachter, B. Mittelstadt, and C. Russell, 'Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR,' Harv. JL & Tech. , vol. 31, p. 841, 2017. -
  4. [48][48] S. Habib, V. Morozov, N. Frontiere, H. Finkel, A. Pope, and K. Heitmann, 'Hacc: Extreme scaling and performance across diverse architectures,' in Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis , 2013, pp. 1-10. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ates, E., Aksar, B., Leung, V. J., & Coskun, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Boston University,Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng.,Boston,MA,USA
  • Boston University (US)
  • Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Venue
2021 International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence (ICAPAI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-05-19
Pages
1-8
OpenAlex
W3081435493
Cited by
88
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.81
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence (ICAPAI) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Keywords
counterfactual explanations, multivariate time series, explainable machine learning, Comte, model interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review