Medical MLLM Is Vulnerable: Cross-Modality Jailbreak and Mismatched Attacks on Medical Multimodal Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Security concerns related to Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively explored; however, the safety implications for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), particularly in medical contexts (MedMLLMs), remain inadequately addressed. This paper investigates the security vulnerabilities of MedMLLMs, focusing on their deployment in clinical environments where the accuracy and relevance of question-and-answer interactions are crucial for addressing complex medical challenges. We introduce and redefine two attack types: mismatched malicious attack (2M-attack) and optimized mismatched malicious attack (O2M-attack), by integrating existing clinical data with atypical natural phenomena. Using the comprehensive 3MAD dataset that we developed, which spans a diverse range of medical imaging modalities and adverse medical scenarios, we performed an in-depth analysis and proposed the MCM optimization method. This approach significantly improves the attack success rate against MedMLLMs. Our evaluations, which include white-box attacks on LLaVA-Med and transfer (black-box) attacks on four other SOTA models, reveal that even MedMLLMs designed with advanced security mechanisms remain vulnerable to breaches. This study highlights the critical need for robust security measures to enhance the safety and reliability of open-source MedMLLMs, especially in light of the potential impact of jailbreak attacks and other malicious exploits in clinical applications. Warning: Medical jailbreaking may generate content that includes unverified diagnoses and treatment recommendations. Always consult professional medical advice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jailbreaking has been thoroughly examined in healthcare contexts through multimodal, white-box internal, and adversarial approaches.
“Jailbreaking has been thoroughly examined in healthcare contexts through multimodal, white-box internal, and adversarial approaches28,29.”
From When helpfulness backfires: LLMs and the risk of false medical information due to sycophantic behavior (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The Abstract and Conclusion (pages unavailable) describe multimodal medical jailbreak attacks, including a white-box attack on LLaVA-Med and transfer attacks on other models. But the Abstract says medical MLLM safety remains inadequately addressed, contrary to “thoroughly examined,” and the cited passages do not establish an examination of model internals beyond white-box access. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 14
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Bakhshandeh, S. 2023. Benchmarking medical large lan- guage models. Nature Reviews Bioengineering, 1(8): 543- 543.
- Berner, E. S.; and Graber, M. L. 2008. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. The American journal of medicine, 121(5): S2-S23.
- Chen, Z.; Varma, M.; Delbrouck, J.-B.; Paschali, M.; Blankemeier, L.; Van Veen, D.; Valanarasu, J. M. J.; Youssef, A.; Cohen, J. P.; Reis, E. P.; et al. 2024b. CheX- agent: Towards a Foundation Model for Chest X-Ray Inter- pretation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12208. · arXiv
- Deng, C.; Zhao, Y.; Tang, X.; Gerstein, M.; and Cohan, A. 2023. Benchmark probing: Investigating data leakage in large language models. In NeurIPS 2023 Workshop on Back- doors in Deep Learning-The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
- Li, C.; Wong, C.; Zhang, S.; Usuyama, N.; Liu, H.; Yang, J.; Naumann, T.; Poon, H.; and Gao, J. 2024. Llava-med: Train- ing a large language-and-vision assistant for biomedicine in one day. Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, 36.
- Liu, F.; Zhu, T.; Wu, X.; Yang, B.; You, C.; Wang, C.; Lu, L.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Sun, X.; et al. 2023a. A medical multimodal large language model for future pandemics. NPJ Digital Medicine, 6(1): 226.
- Liu, H.; Li, C.; Wu, Q.; and Lee, Y. J. 2023b. Visual in- struction tuning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36.
- Magar, I.; and Schwartz, R. 2022. Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitation. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), 157-165.
- Moor, M.; Banerjee, O.; Abad, Z. S. H.; Krumholz, H. M.; Leskovec, J.; Topol, E. J.; and Rajpurkar, P. 2023a. Foun- dation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature, 616(7956): 259-265.
- PMLR.
- Qian, J.; Jin, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Cai, G.; and Liu, B. 2024. A Liver Cancer Question-Answering System Based on Next- Generation Intelligence and the Large Model Med-PaLM 2. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 2(1): 28-35.
- Schiff, G. D.; Hasan, O.; Kim, S.; Abrams, R.; Cosby, K.; Lambert, B. L.; Elstein, A. S.; Hasler, S.; Kabongo, M. L.; Krosnjar, N.; et al. 2009. Diagnostic error in medicine: anal- ysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Archives of internal medicine, 169(20): 1881-1887.
- Singhal, K.; Azizi, S.; Tu, T.; Mahdavi, S. S.; Wei, J.; Chung, H. W.; Scales, N.; Tanwani, A.; Cole-Lewis, H.; Pfohl, S.; et al. 2023a. Large language models encode clinical knowl- edge. Nature, 620(7972): 172-180.
- Thirunavukarasu, A. J.; Ting, D. S. J.; Elangovan, K.; Gutierrez, L.; Tan, T. F.; and Ting, D. S. W. 2023. Large lan- guage models in medicine. Nature medicine, 29(8): 1930- 1940.
- Zhang, K.; Yu, J.; Yan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Adhikarla, E.; Fu, S.; Chen, X.; Chen, C.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; et al. 2023a. Biomedgpt: A unified and generalist biomedical genera- tive pre-trained transformer for vision, language, and mul- timodal tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17100. · arXiv
- Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhao, Z.; Fang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Yang, X.; Wei, X.; et al. 2024. Benchmarking Trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Lan- guage Models: A Comprehensive Study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07057. · arXiv
- Authors
- Huang, X., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Zhu, Y., Xi, J., An, J., Wang, H., Liang, H., & Pan, C.
- Affiliations
- Beihang University (CN)
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2025-04-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3797-3805
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W4409368591
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 13.28
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (JQ23019, 4232046, 62203032, 62403038)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- jailbreak attacks, transfer attacks, medical question answering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review