Cited by 54Social Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systemsAI in Service Interactions

Believable Robot Characters

Open access
Simmons, Reid, Makatchev, Maxim, Kirby, Rachel, Lee, Min Kyung, Fanaswala, Imran, Browning, Brett, Forlizzi, Jodi, Sakr, Majd·2011·AI Magazine

Abstract

Believability of characters has been an objective in literature, theater, film, and animation. We argue that believable robot characters are important in human‐robot interaction, as well. In particular, we contend that believable characters evoke users' social responses that, for some tasks, lead to more natural interactions and are associated with improved task performance. In a dialogue‐capable robot, a key to such believability is the integration of a consistent story line, verbal and nonverbal behaviors, and sociocultural context. We describe our work in this area and present empirical results from three robot receptionist test beds that operate “in the wild.”

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aimag.v32i4.2383

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Greetings and farewells are considered adequate means to encourage social responses by users.

    “Greetings and farewells are considered adequate means to encourage social responses by users (e.g., Simmons et al. 2011)”

    From AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance (2021) · cites this paper as Simmons et al. 2011

    In “Eliciting Social Behaviors through Dialogue Strategies,” the paper reports that a robot greeting increased the likelihood of a user greeting, and that priming users with “Thanks for stopping by” increased thanking and farewells. It treats farewells as a user response, not as a means the robot uses to encourage social responses; it also does not establish that greetings alone are adequate for that purpose. Page numbers are not available in the supplied passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Browning, B.; and Sakr, M. 2011. Interac- tional Disparities in English and Arabic Native Speakers with a Bi-Lingual Robot Receptionist. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 133-134. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
  2. Fischer, K. 2006. The Role of Users' Preconceptions in Talking to Computers and Robots. Paper presented at the Workshop on How People Talk to Computers, Robots, and Other Artificial Communication Partners, Delmen- horst, Germany, 21-23 April.
  3. Hoffman, G. 2011. On Stage: Robots as Performers. Paper presented at the RSS 2011 Workshop on Human-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Contributions to Robotics from the Human Sciences. Los Angeles, CA, 1 July.
  4. Ishiguro, H. 2005. Android Science. Toward a New Cross- Interdisciplinary Framework. Paper presented at Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science: An ICCS/CogSci- 2006 Long Symposium. Vancouver, BC, Canada, 26 July.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simmons, R., Makatchev, M., Kirby, R., Lee, M. K., Fanaswala, I., Browning, B., Forlizzi, J., & Sakr, M.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University Qatar (QA)
Venue
AI Magazine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
39-52
ISSN
  • 0738-4602 (ISSN-L)
  • 2371-9621
OpenAlex
W2137789046
Cited by
54
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
AI Magazine (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Qatar National Research Fund
  • National Science Foundation (IIS‐0624275, CNS‐0709077)
  • Kwanjeong Educational Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
believable characters, robot characters, human-robot interaction, nonverbal behavior, sociocultural context, task performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review