Cited by 25Machine Learning in Materials ScienceX-ray Diffraction in CrystallographySpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Phase‐Mapper: Accelerating Materials Discovery with AI

Open access
Bai, Junwen, Xue, Yexiang, Bjorck, Johan, Bras, Ronan Le, Rappazzo, Brendan, Bernstein, Richard, Suram, Santosh K., van Dover, R. Bruce +2 more·2018·AI Magazine

Abstract

From the stone age to the bronze, iron, and modern silicon ages, the discovery and characterization of new materials has always been instrumental to humanity's development and progress. With the current pressing need to address sustainability challenges and find alternatives to fossil fuels, we look for solutions in the development of new materials that will allow for renewable energy. To discover materials with the required properties, materials scientists can perform high‐throughput materials discovery, which includes rapid synthesis and characterization via X‐ray diffraction (XRD) of thousands of materials. A central problem in materials discovery, the phase map identification problem, involves the determination of the crystal structure of materials from materials composition and structural characterization data. This analysis is traditionally performed mainly by hand, which can take days for a single material system. In this work we present Phase‐Mapper, a solution platform that tightly integrates XRD experimentation, AI problem solving, and human intelligence for interpreting XRD patterns and inferring the crystal structures of the underlying materials. Phase‐Mapper is compatible with any spectral demixing algorithm, including our novel solver, AgileFD, which is based on convolutive nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF). AgileFD allows materials scientists to rapidly interpret XRD patterns, and incorporates constraints to capture prior knowledge about the physics of the materials as well as human feedback. With our system, materials scientists have been able to interpret previously unsolvable systems of XRD data at the Department of Energy's Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, including the Nb‐Mn‐V oxide system, which led to the discovery of new solar light absorbers and is provided as an illustrative example of AI‐enabled high‐throughput materials discovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aimag.v39i1.2785

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The process of discovering new materials can be slow and imprecise; the physics behind materials are not completely understood, so human experts often manually apply heuristics to understand a proposed material's physical properties.

    “However, the process of discovering new materials can be slow and imprecise; the physics behind materials are not completely understood, so human experts often manually apply heuristics to understand a proposed material's physical properties [49,105].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [49]

  • Recent work has used tools from ML, AI, optimization, and physics to figure out a proposed material's crystal structure, with the goal of accelerating materials discovery for solar fuels.

    “recent work has used tools from ML, AI, optimization, and physics to figure out a proposed material's crystal structure, with the goal of accelerating materials discovery for solar fuels [49,298,773].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [49]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Cham, Germany: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642- 31612-8_14 · DOI
  2. Le Bras, R.; Bernstein, R.; Gregoire, J. M.; Suram, S. K.; Gomes, C. P.; Selman, B.; and van Dover, R. B. 2014. A Com- putational Challenge Problem in Materials Discovery: Syn- thetic Problem Generator and Real-World Datasets. In Pro- ceedings of the 28th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, [page numbers]. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
  3. Cham, Ger- many: Springer.
  4. Lee, D. D., and Seung, H. S. 2001. Algorithms for Nonnega- tive Matrix Factorization. In Proceedings of the 15th Confer- ence of Neural Information Processing Systems, 556-562.
  5. Cam- bridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  6. Xue, Y.; Bai, J.; Le Bras, R.; Rappazzo, B.; Bernstein, R.; Bjor- ck, J.; Suram, S. K.; van Dover, R. B.; Gregoire, J.; and Gomes, C. P. 2017. Phase-Mapper: An AI Platform to Accelerate High Throughput Materials Discovery. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
  7. Xue, Y.; Ermon, S.; Gomes, C. P.; and Selman, B. 2015. Uncovering Hidden Structure through Parallel Problem Decomposition for the Set Basis Problem: Application to Materials Discovery. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Inter- national Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 146-154. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bai, J., Xue, Y., Bjorck, J., Bras, R. L., Rappazzo, B., Bernstein, R., Suram, S. K., van Dover, R. B., Gregoire, J. M., & Gomes, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
AI Magazine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
15-26
ISSN
  • 0738-4602 (ISSN-L)
  • 2371-9621
OpenAlex
W2795270513
Cited by
25
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI Magazine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1344201, 1522054, 0832782, 1059284)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (76SF00515, DE–AC02–76SF00515, DESC0004993, AC02‐76SF00515, No. DE-AC02–76SF00515, Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515, DE-AC02-)
  • Office of Science (AC02-76SF00515, DE-AC02-76SF0051 5, DE-AC02, 76SF00515, DESC0004993)
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02, DE-SC0004993, 76SF00515, Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515, AC02-76SF00515, DE-AC-02-76SF00515)
  • Army Research Office (W911-NF-14-1-0498)
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (DEAC02−76SF00515, AC02‐76SF00515, Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Keywords
crystal structure determination, high-throughput materials discovery, human-in-the-loop AI, artificial photosynthesis, materials informatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review