Cited by 50Mental Health via WritingMental Health Treatment and AccessImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Characterizing Audience Engagement and Assessing Its Impact on Social Media Disclosures of Mental Illnesses

Open access
Ernala, Sindhu Kiranmai, Labetoulle, Tristan, Bane, Fred, Birnbaum, Michael L., Rizvi, Asra F., Kane, John M., De Choudhury, Munmun·2018·Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Abstract

Self-disclosures of mental illnesses have been identified to yield coping and therapeutic benefits. An important construct in the self-disclosure process is the audience with whom the individual interacts and shares their experiences. Mental illness self-disclosures are increasingly happening online. However, unlike online support communities where the audience comprises sympathetic peers with similar experiences, what the discloser gains from an ‘invisible’ audience on a general purpose, public social media platform is less understood. Focusing on a highly stigmatized mental illness, schizophrenia, this paper provides the first investigation characterizing the audience of disclosures of this condition on Twitter and how the audience’s engagement impacts future disclosures. Our results are based on a rich year-long temporal analysis of the data of nearly 400 disclosers and their nearly 400 thousand audiences. First, characterizing and modeling the audience engagement temporally, we find evidence of reciprocity in the disclosure process between the discloser and their audience. Then, situating our work in the Social Penetration Theory and operationalizing the disclosure process via a measure of intimacy, an auto-regressive time series model indicates that the patterns of audience engagement and content can forecast changes in the intimacy of disclosures. We discuss the implications for building socially engaging, supportive online spaces for stigmatized mental illness disclosures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15027

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Twitter is one of the most popular social media platforms, and its public-facing, microblogging-based design enables candid self-disclosure and self-expressions for individuals.

    “Twitter is one of the most popular social media platforms, and its public-facing, microblogging–based design enables candid self-disclosure and self-expressions for individuals [27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Andalibi, N.; Ozturk, P.; and Forte, A. 2017. Sensitive self- disclosures, responses, and social support on instagram: the case of #depression. In CSCW.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ernala, S. K., Labetoulle, T., Bane, F., Birnbaum, M. L., Rizvi, A. F., Kane, J. M., & De Choudhury, M.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Zucker Hillside Hospital (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
Published
2018-06-15
Volume
12
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-0770
OpenAlex
W2810163710
Cited by
50
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
11.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM112697)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
schizophrenia, audience engagement, social media, Twitter, intimacy, social penetration theory, online stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review