The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling the Detection of Textual Cyberbullying
Open accessAbstract
The scourge of cyberbullying has assumed alarming proportions with an ever-increasing number of adolescents admitting to having dealt with it either as a victim or as a bystander. Anonymity and the lack of meaningful supervision in the electronic medium are two factors that have exacerbated this social menace. Comments or posts involving sensitive topics that are personal to an individual are more likely to be internalized by a victim, often resulting in tragic outcomes. We decompose the overall detection problem into detection of sensitive topics, lending itself into text classification sub-problems. We experiment with a corpus of 4500 YouTube comments, applying a range of binary and multiclass classifiers. We find that binary classifiers for individual labels outperform multiclass classifiers. Our findings show that the detection of textual cyberbullying can be tackled by building individual topic-sensitive classifiers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x · Cited by 3,639
Cited by
A Survey on Automatic Detection of Hate Speech in Text
Fortuna, P., & Nunes, S. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3232676 · Cited by 1,241
Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale
Wulczyn, E., Thain, N., & Dixon, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052591 · Cited by 636
Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtasks
Waseem, Z., Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., & Weber, I. (2017) · Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-3012 · Cited by 474
You Can't Stay Here: The Efficacy of Reddit's 2015 Ban Examined Through Hate Speech
Chandrasekharan, E., Pavalanathan, U., Srinivasan, A., Glynn, A., Eisenstein, J., & Gilbert, E. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3134666 · Cited by 390
Deep Learning for Detecting Cyberbullying Across Multiple Social Media Platforms
Agrawal, S., & Awekar, A. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_11 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Authors
- Dinakar, K., Reichart, R., & Lieberman, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
- Published
- 2021-08-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 11-17
- ISSN
- 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-0770
- OpenAlex
- W2209227144
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling the Detection of Textual Cyberbullying. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1609/icwsm.v5i3.14209
- The paper
- Dinakar, K., Reichart, R., & Lieberman, H. (2021). Modeling the Detection of Textual Cyberbullying. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i3.14209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.