The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost-Sensitive Classification: Empirical Evaluation of a Hybrid Genetic Decision Tree Induction Algorithm
Open accessAbstract
This paper introduces ICET, a new algorithm for cost-sensitive classification. ICET uses a genetic algorithm to evolve a population of biases for a decision tree induction algorithm. The fitness function of the genetic algorithm is the average cost of classification when using the decision tree, including both the costs of tests (features, measurements) and the costs of classification errors. ICET is compared here with three other algorithms for cost-sensitive classification - EG2, CS-ID3, and IDX - and also with C4.5, which classifies without regard to cost. The five algorithms are evaluated empirically on five real-world medical datasets. Three sets of experiments are performed. The first set examines the baseline performance of the five algorithms on the five datasets and establishes that ICET performs significantly better than its competitors. The second set tests the robustness of ICET under a variety of conditions and shows that ICET maintains its advantage. The third set looks at ICET's search in bias space and discovers a way to improve the search.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CANALIZATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND THE INHERITANCE OF ACQUIRED CHARACTERS
WADDINGTON, C. H. (1942) · Nature · doi:10.1038/150563a0 · Cited by 3,255
Baldwin, J. M. (1896) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/276408 · Cited by 1,781
Cited by
A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models
FIELDING, A. H., & BELL, J. F. (1997) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892997000088 · Cited by 6,956
Automatic Construction of Decision Trees from Data: A Multi-Disciplinary Survey
Murthy, S. K. (1998) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1023/a:1009744630224 · Cited by 991
Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence
(2012) · Series in machine perception and artificial intelligence · doi:10.1142/smpai · Cited by 365
Scenario-Based Insider Threat Detection From Cyber Activities
Chattopadhyay, P., Wang, L., & Tan, Y.-P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2018.2857473 · Cited by 115
Training an Active Random Field for Real-Time Image Denoising
Barbu, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2009.2028254 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Turney, P. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
- Publisher
- AI Access Foundation
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 369-409
- ISSN
- 1076-9757 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104597806
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost-Sensitive Classification: Empirical Evaluation of a Hybrid Genetic Decision Tree Induction Algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1613/jair.120
- The paper
- Turney, P. D. (1995). Cost-Sensitive Classification: Empirical Evaluation of a Hybrid Genetic Decision Tree Induction Algorithm. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.