A Personalized System for Conversational Recommendations
Open accessAbstract
Searching for and making decisions about information is becoming increasingly difficult as the amount of information and number of choices increases. Recommendation systems help users find items of interest of a particular type, such as movies or restaurants, but are still somewhat awkward to use. Our solution is to take advantage of the complementary strengths of personalized recommendation systems and dialogue systems, creating personalized aides. We present a system -- the Adaptive Place Advisor -- that treats item selection as an interactive, conversational process, with the program inquiring about item attributes and the user responding. Individual, long-term user preferences are unobtrusively obtained in the course of normal recommendation dialogues and used to direct future conversations with the same user. We present a novel user model that influences both item search and the questions asked during a conversation. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our system in significantly reducing the time and number of interactions required to find a satisfactory item, as compared to a control group of users interacting with a non-adaptive version of the system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effects of personalization have been evaluated by measuring efficiency, user satisfaction, relevance, understandability, information quality, and appropriateness of system responses.
“The effects of personalization have been evaluated in various ways by measuring aspects like efficiency in terms of the number and duration of interactions [11,20], user satisfaction, relevance, and understandability [20], information quality presented [21], and appropriateness of system responses [10].”
From The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
Cites
Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches
Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994) · AI Communications · doi:10.3233/aic-1994-7104 · Cited by 5,624 · see citing works
Allen, J. E., Guinn, C. I., & Horvtz, E. (1999) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/5254.796083 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text
Mairesse, F., Walker, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Moore, R. K. (2007) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.2349 · Cited by 1,046 · see citing works
The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review
Kocaballi, A. B., Berkovsky, S., Quiroz, J. C., Laranjo, L., Tong, H. L., Rezazadegan, D., Briatore, A., & Coiera, E. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/15360 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
A Strategy for Information Presentation in Spoken Dialog Systems
Demberg, V., Winterboer, A., & Moore, J. D. (2011) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00064 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thompson, C. A., Goker, M. H., & Langley, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
- Publisher
- AI Access Foundation
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 393-428
- ISSN
- 1076-9757 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152883745
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 51.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Keywords
- conversational recommendation, personalized recommendation, dialogue systems, user modeling, adaptive recommendation, user preferences, information overload, item selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review