The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sentiment Analysis of Short Informal Texts
Open accessAbstract
We describe a state-of-the-art sentiment analysis system that detects (a) the sentiment of short informal textual messages such as tweets and SMS (message-level task) and (b) the sentiment of a word or a phrase within a message (term-level task). The system is based on a supervised statistical text classification approach leveraging a variety of surface-form, semantic, and sentiment features. The sentiment features are primarily derived from novel high-coverage tweet-specific sentiment lexicons. These lexicons are automatically generated from tweets with sentiment-word hashtags and from tweets with emoticons. To adequately capture the sentiment of words in negated contexts, a separate sentiment lexicon is generated for negated words. The system ranked first in the SemEval-2013 shared task `Sentiment Analysis in Twitter' (Task 2), obtaining an F-score of 69.02 in the message-level task and 88.93 in the term-level task. Post-competition improvements boost the performance to an F-score of 70.45 (message-level task) and 89.50 (term-level task). The system also obtains state-of-the-art performance on two additional datasets: the SemEval-2013 SMS test set and a corpus of movie review excerpts. The ablation experiments demonstrate that the use of the automatically generated lexicons results in performance gains of up to 6.5 absolute percentage points.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis
Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00049 · Cited by 3,301
Cited by
Sentiment analysis using deep learning architectures: a review
Yadav, A., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-019-09794-5 · Cited by 841
SemEval-2018 Task 1: Affect in Tweets
Mohammad, S., Bravo-Marquez, F., Salameh, M., & Kiritchenko, S. (2018) · Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation · doi:10.18653/v1/s18-1001 · Cited by 746
Self-citationNRC-Canada-2014: Detecting Aspects and Sentiment in Customer Reviews
Kiritchenko, S., Zhu, X., Cherry, C., & Mohammad, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014) · doi:10.3115/v1/s14-2076 · Cited by 697
Self-citationA survey on sentiment analysis challenges
Hussein, D. M. E.-D. M. (2018) · Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksues.2016.04.002 · Cited by 659
Deep Convolution Neural Networks for Twitter Sentiment Analysis
Jianqiang, Z., Xiaolin, G., & Xuejun, Z. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2776930 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiritchenko, S., Zhu, X., & Mohammad, S. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
- Publisher
- AI Access Foundation
- Published
- 2014-08-20
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 723-762
- ISSN
- 1076-9757 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156413587
- Cited by
- 880
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 93.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sentiment Analysis of Short Informal Texts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1613/jair.4272
- The paper
- Kiritchenko, S., Zhu, X., & Mohammad, S. M. (2014). Sentiment Analysis of Short Informal Texts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.4272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.