The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Weed Control, Weed Management, and Integrated Weed Management
Open accessAbstract
Integrated weed management (IWM) can be defined as a holistic approach to weed management that integrates different methods of weed control to provide the crop with an advantage over weeds. It is practiced globally at varying levels of adoption from farm to farm. IWM has the potential to restrict weed populations to manageable levels, reduce the environmental impact of individual weed management practices, increase cropping system sustainability, and reduce selection pressure for weed resistance to herbicides. There is some debate as to whether simple herbicidal weed control programs have now shifted to more diverse IWM cropping systems. Given the rapid evolution and spread of herbicide-resistant weeds and their negative consequences, one might predict that IWM research would currently be a prominent activity among weed scientists. Here we examine the level of research activity dedicated to weed control techniques and the assemblage of IWM techniques in cropping systems as evidenced by scientific paper publications from 1995 to June 1, 2012. Authors from the United States have published more weed and IWM-related articles than authors from any other country. When IWM articles were weighted as a proportion of country population, arable land, or crop production, authors from Switzerland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada were most prominent. Considerable evidence exists that research on nonherbicidal weed management strategies as well as strategies that integrate other weed management systems with herbicide use has increased. However, articles published on chemical control still eclipse any other weed management method. The latter emphasis continues to retard the development of weed science as a balanced discipline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds
Heap, I. (1997) · Cited by 3,066
Evolution in Action: Plants Resistant to Herbicides
Powles, S. B., & Yu, Q. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112119 · Cited by 1,714
Crop Rotation and Intercropping Strategies for Weed Management
Liebman, M., & Dyck, E. (1993) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/1941795 · Cited by 983
Integrated Weed Management: The Rationale and Approach
Swanton, C. J., & Weise, S. F. (1991) · Weed Technology · doi:10.1017/s0890037x00027512 · Cited by 542
Ehler, L. E. (2006) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1247 · Cited by 472
Weed management in agroecosystems: ecological approaches
Altieri, M. A., & Liebman, M. (1988) · CRC Press eBooks · Cited by 438
Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia
Culpepper, A. S., Grey, T. L., Vencill, W. K., Kichler, J. M., Webster, T. M., Brown, S. M., York, A. C., Davis, J. W., & Hanna, W. W. (2006) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/ws-06-001r.1 · Cited by 423
Herbicide-Resistant Weeds: Management Tactics and Practices
Beckie, H. J. (2006) · Weed Technology · doi:10.1614/wt-05-084r1.1 · Cited by 394
Barrett, S. H. (1983) · Economic Botany · doi:10.1007/bf02858881 · Cited by 391
Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds
Liebman, M., Mohler, C. L., & Staver, C. P. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511541810 · Cited by 341
Cited by
An ecological future for weed science to sustain crop production and the environment. A review
MacLaren, C., Storkey, J., Menegat, A., Metcalfe, H., & Dehnen-Schmutz, K. (2020) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-020-00631-6 · Cited by 348
What good are unmanned aircraft systems for agricultural remote sensing and precision agriculture?
Hunt, E. R., & Daughtry, C. S. T. (2018) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2017.1410300 · Cited by 325
Schütte, G., Eckerstorfer, M., Rastelli, V., Reichenbecher, W., Restrepo-Vassalli, S., Ruohonen-Lehto, M., Saucy, A.-G. W., & Mertens, M. (2017) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0100-y · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Harker, K. N., & O'Donovan, J. T.
- Venue
- Weed Technology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0890-037X (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2740
- OpenAlex
- W2021886222
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 16.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent Weed Control, Weed Management, and Integrated Weed Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1614/wt-d-12-00109.1
- The paper
- Harker, K. N., & O'Donovan, J. T. (2013). Recent Weed Control, Weed Management, and Integrated Weed Management. Weed Technology. https://doi.org/10.1614/wt-d-12-00109.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.