The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia
Abstract
A glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth biotype was confirmed in central Georgia. In the field, glyphosate applied to 5- to 13-cm-tall Palmer amaranth at three times the normal use rate of 0.84 kg ae ha−1 controlled this biotype only 17%. The biotype was controlled 82% by glyphosate at 12 times the normal use rate. In the greenhouse,I50 values (rate necessary for 50% inhibition) for visual control and shoot fresh weight, expressed as percentage of the nontreated, were 8 and 6.2 times greater, respectively, with the resistant biotype compared with a known glyphosate-susceptible biotype. Glyphosate absorption and translocation and the number of chromosomes did not differ between biotypes. Shikimate was detected in leaf tissue of the susceptible biotype treated with glyphosate but not in the resistant biotype.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds
Heap, I. (1997) · Cited by 3,066
Log-Logistic Analysis of Herbicide Dose-Response Relationships
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., & Fuerst, E. P. (1995) · Weed Technology · doi:10.1017/s0890037x00023253 · Cited by 1,359
Salsburg, D. S. (2020) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003065623 · Cited by 550
Amrhein, N., Deus, B., Gehrke, P., & Steinrücken, H. C. (1980) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.66.5.830 · Cited by 473
Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware
VanGessel, M. J. (2001) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0703:rprhfd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 458
Principles and methods of toxicology
Netter, K. J. (1989) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0300-483x(89)90014-0 · Cited by 376
Perspectives on Glyphosate Resistance
Bradshaw, L. D., Padgette, S. R., Kimball, S. L., & Wells, B. H. (1997) · Weed Technology · doi:10.1017/s0890037x00041567 · Cited by 317
Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant cotton.
Culpepper, A. S., & York, A. C. (1998) · The journal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science · Cited by 171
Self-citationMueller, T. C., Massey, J. H., Hayes, R. M., Main, C. L., & Stewart, C. N. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf026006k · Cited by 161
Morgan, G. D., Baumann, P. A., & Chandler, J. M. (2001) · Weed Technology · doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2001)015[0408:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 143
Cited by
Overview of glyphosate‐resistant weeds worldwide
Heap, I., & Duke, S. O. (2018) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4760 · Cited by 518
Meftaul, I. M., Venkateswarlu, K., Dharmarajan, R., Annamalai, P., Asaduzzaman, M., Parven, A., & Megharaj, M. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114372 · Cited by 218
Kniss, A. R. (2018) · Weed Science · doi:10.1017/wsc.2017.70 · Cited by 103
How well will stacked transgenic pest/herbicide resistances delay pests from evolving resistance?
Gressel, J., Gassmann, A. J., & Owen, M. D. (2017) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4425 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Culpepper, A. S., Grey, T. L., Vencill, W. K., Kichler, J. M., Webster, T. M., Brown, S. M., York, A. C., Davis, J. W., & Hanna, W. W.
- Venue
- Weed Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 620-626
- ISSN
- 0043-1745 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2759
- OpenAlex
- W2176876302
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 22.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1614/ws-06-001r.1
- The paper
- Culpepper, A. S., Grey, T. L., Vencill, W. K., Kichler, J. M., Webster, T. M., Brown, S. M., York, A. C., Davis, J. W., & Hanna, W. W. (2006). Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Science. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-06-001r.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
